Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, providing background context, the conservation action(s) taken and their consequences.
Review the associated Actions
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
0 selected |
|
Study | Published | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|
The potential for golf courses to support restoration of biodiversity for biobanking offsets Based on: Burgin S. & Wotherspoon D. (2009). Study Link |
2009 | 6 | |
Native vegetation corridors in exotic pine plantations provide long-term habitat for frogs Based on: Lemckert F.L., Brassil T.E. & Towerton A. (2005). Study Link |
2005 | 1 | |
Monitoring a population of common toads (Bufo bufo) in a housing development Based on: Cooke A.S. (2000). Study Link |
2000 | 1 | |
Limitations of regulated "buffer zones" for the conservation of marbled salamanders Based on: Gamble L.R., McGarigal K., Jenkins C.L. & Timm B.C. (2006). Study Link |
2006 | 1 | |
Effects of terrestrial buffer zones on amphibians on golf courses Based on: Puglis H.J. & Boone M.D. (2012). Study Link |
2012 | 1 | |
Conservation of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita in Britain over the period 1976-1990 in relation to site protection and other factors Based on: Banks B., Beebee T.J.C. & Cooke K.S. (1994). Study Link |
1994 | 1 | |
Comparison of Red Hills salamander (Phaeognathus hubrichti) populations between undisturbed and disturbed sites Based on: Godwin J. & Apodaca J.J. (2011) Unpublished report, submitted to the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Alabama Endangered Wildlife Projects No.151, 18pp. Study Link |
2011 | 1 |
0 selected |
|
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.
What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.
More about What Works in Conservation
Download free PDF or purchaseAn online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.
Read the latest volume: Volume 21
Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.
We use limited Cookies to run the site and to analyse our traffic (none for site vendors). By using this site, you will be providing your consent to our use of Cookies.
Accept & continueFields with * are required.