Catalogue of Conservation Reports:
Results from Systematic Searches
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
311 studies found
Refine
Hide
311 studies found
Download these search results:
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Study | Published | |
---|---|---|
Aquatic Weed Control Operation Best Practice Guidelines Based on: Barrett P.R.F., Greaves M.P. & Newman J.R. (1999) Environment Agency report, R&D Technical Report W111, 132pp. |
1999 | |
Eradication of Alien Crayfish Populations Based on: Peay S. (2001) Environment Agency report, R&D Technical Report W1-037/TR1, 116pp. |
2001 | |
Update of Saltmarsh Management Manual: Science Summary Based on: Environment Agency . (2007) Environment Agency report, Science Report: SC030220/SR. |
2007 | |
Saltmarsh Management Manual Based on: Adnitt C., Brew D., Cottle R., Hardwick M., John S., Leggett D., McNulty S., Meakins N. & Staniland R. (2007) Environment Agency report, R&D Technical Report SC030220, 123pp. |
2007 | |
Stoneworts: Their Habitats, Ecological Requirements and Conservation Based on: Lambert S. (2009) Environment Agency report, Science report: SC030202, 15pp. |
2009 | |
Re-introduction of Triangular Club-rush Based on: Environment Agency . (2002) Environment Agency report, R&D Technical Summary W1-045/TS. |
2002 | |
Acoustic Deterrents for Otter Management at Stillwater Fisheries: Preliminary Investigation Based on: Harrington A., Harrington L. & Macdonald D. (2013) Environment Agency report. |
2013 | |
Guidance on Habitat for White-clawed Crayfish and its Restoration Based on: Peay S. (2002) Environment Agency report, Technical Report W1-067/TR, 72pp. |
2002 | |
The Ecology and Conservation of the Southern Damselfly (Coenagrion mercuriale – Charpentier) in Britain Based on: Purse B. (2002) Environment Agency report, R&D Technical Report W1-021/TR, 122pp. |
2002 | |
Nuclear Power Station Cooling Waters: Protecting Biota: Chief Scientist’s Group report Based on: Seaby R. (2020) Environment Agency report, Version: SC180004/R1, 193pp. |
2020 | |
Protection of Biota from Cooling Water Intakes at Nuclear Power stations: Scoping study Based on: Horsfield R. (2018) Environment Agency report, Project: SC160009/R1, 43pp. |
2018 | |
Understanding Fish and Eel Behaviour to Improve Protection and Passage at River Structures Based on: Piper A. & Wright R. (2017) Environment Agency report, Project: SC120061, 22pp. |
2017 | |
Impact of catch and release angling practices on survival of salmon Based on: Cowx I.G., Angelopoulos N., Dodd J.D. & Nunn A.D. (2017) Environment Agency report, Project EcoSF2/16/93, 38pp. |
2017 | |
Testing the effectiveness of fish screens for hydropower intakes Based on: Inglis M.L., McCoy G.L. & Robson M. (2016) Environment Agency report, Project SC120079, 134pp. |
2016 | |
Genetic Impacts of Stocking on Indigenous Brown Trout Populations Based on: Ferguson A. (2007) Environment Agency report, Science Report: SC040071/SR. |
2007 | |
Screening for Intake and Outfalls: A Best Practice Guide Based on: Turnpenny A.W.H. & O’Keeffe N. (2005) Environment Agency report, Science Report SC030231. |
2005 | |
Optimum Stocking Strategies for Hatchery-Reared Riverine Coarse Fish Based on: Barnard S., Andrews K. & Ellis J. (2002) Environment Agency report, R&D Technical Report W2-i651/TR. |
2002 | |
Shad Conservation in England and Wales Based on: Aprahamian M.W., Lester S.M. & Aprahamian C.D. (1999) Environment Agency report, R & D Technical Report W110. |
1999 | |
The Transportation of the Maximum Gain Salmon Spawning Target from the River Bush (N.I.) to England and Wales Based on: Wyatt R.J. & Barnard S. (1997) Environment Agency report, R&D Technical Report TR W65. |
1997 | |
Impact of stocked Rainbow Trout on resident salmonid populations. Phase I, scoping study Based on: Welton J.S., Ibbotson A.T., Ladle M. & Brookes A.M. (1997) Environment Agency report, R&D Technical Report W61 by Institute of Freshwater Ecology. |
1997 | |
Restoration of Riverine Trout Habitats; A Guidance Manual, Based on: Summers D.W., Giles N. & Willis D.J. (1996) Environment Agency report, The Game Conservancy Trust Fisheries Technical Manual 1; Technical Report W18. |
1996 | |
Endangered and Threatened Fishes in the Klamath River Basin: Causes of Decline and Strategies for Recovery Based on: National Research Council . (2004) National Academies Press report, The National Academies Press: Washington, DC. |
2004 | |
Atlantic Salmon in Maine Based on: National Research Council . (2004) National Academies Press report, The National Academies Press: Washington, DC. |
2004 | |
An assessment of the impact of controlled burning on reptile populations Based on: Jofré G. & Reading C. (2012) Amphibian and Reptile Conservation (ARC) report, ARC Research Report 12/02. |
2012 | |
An assessment of the impact of conservation grazing on reptile populations Based on: Jofré G. & Reading C. (2012) Amphibian and Reptile Conservation (ARC) report, ARC Research Report 12/01. |
2012 |
Download these search results:
0 selected |
|
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.
What Works in Conservation
What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.
More about What Works in Conservation
Download free PDF or purchaseThe Conservation Evidence Journal
An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.
Read the latest volume: Volume 21
Discover more on our blog
Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.
Go to the Conservation Evidence blog
Who uses Conservation Evidence?
Meet some of the evidence champions
For a full list of, and information about, our champions:
All Evidence ChampionsAbout our champions, why and how to become one:
Become an Evidence ChampionThis website uses Cookies
We use limited Cookies to run the site and to analyse our traffic (none for site vendors). By using this site, you will be providing your consent to our use of Cookies.
Accept & continue1 Select a category
- Birds
- Marshes and Swamps
- Reptiles
- Terrestrial Mammals
- Subtidal benthic invertebrates
- Bats
- Marine and Freshwater Mammals
- Control of Freshwater Invasive Species
- Primates
- Amphibians
- Peatlands
- Butterflies and moths
- Forest
- Farmland
- Shrublands and Heathlands
- Captive Animals
- Marine fish
- Mediterranean Farmland
- Bees
- Marine artificial structures
- Grassland
- Soils
- Aquaculture
- Natural Pest Control
2 Refine category
3 View actions
What concerns you?
Fields with * are required.
Letters are not case-sensitive.