Action Synopsis: Bat Conservation About Actions

Automatically reduce turbine blade rotation when bat activity is high

How is the evidence assessed?
  • Effectiveness
  • Certainty
  • Harms

Source countries

Key messages

  • Two studies evaluated the effects of automatically reducing turbine blade rotation when bat activity is high on bat populations. One study was in Germany, and one in the USA.



  • Survival (2 studies): Two replicated studies (one randomized, controlled and one paired sites study) in Germany and the USA found that automatically reducing the rotation speed of wind turbine blades when bat activity is predicted to be high resulted in significantly fewer bat fatalities for all bat species combined and for little brown bats.


About key messages

Key messages provide a descriptive index to studies we have found that test this intervention.

Studies are not directly comparable or of equal value. When making decisions based on this evidence, you should consider factors such as study size, study design, reported metrics and relevance of the study to your situation, rather than simply counting the number of studies that support a particular interpretation.

Supporting evidence from individual studies

  1. A replicated, paired sites study in 2012 at eight pairs of wind turbines in Germany (Behr et al. 2016) found that using automated ‘bat-friendly’ operating systems that reduced turbine blade rotation speed resulted in fewer bat fatalities than at normally operated wind turbines. Total bat fatalities and average collision rates were lower at automated turbines (total 2 bat fatalities, 0.01 fatalities/turbine/night) than at normally operated turbines (total 21 bat fatalities, 0.06 fatalities/turbine/night). At automated turbines, predictive models identified periods of high fatality risk and low energy yield from bat activity and wind speed data. During these periods, rotor blades were moved parallel to the wind to reduce rotation speed according to a target bat fatality rate (0.01 fatalities/turbine/night). Normally operated turbines rotated freely. At each of eight sites, automated and normal operating modes were alternated weekly between two paired turbines over 14 weeks in July–October 2012. Carcass searches were carried out daily. If applied to all turbines, it was estimated that automated operation would result in annual energy losses of 2.1%.

    Study and other actions tested
  2. A randomized, replicated, controlled study in 2015 at a wind energy facility in Wisconsin, USA (Electric Power Research Institute 2017) found that using automated ‘Smart Curtailment’ operating systems that reduced turbine blade rotation speed resulted in fewer fatalities for all bat species combined and for little brown bats Myotis lucifugus than at normally operated wind turbines. There was an 83% reduction in fatalities for all bats and a 90% reduction in fatalities for little brown bats at automated turbines (all bats: average 3 fatalities/day; little brown bats: 0.3 fatalities/day) compared with normally operated turbines (all bats: 18 fatalities/day; little brown bats: 3 fatalities/day). Twenty turbines were randomly selected for the study (10 operated by automated systems and 10 normally operated). At automated turbines, fatality risk was calculated by a predictive model using real-time bat activity and wind speed data every 10 minutes. If fatality risk was high (wind speed ≥3.5 m/s and >1 bat call detected in the previous 10 minutes), rotors were slowed (to ≤2 rpm) for 30 minutes. Normally operated turbines rotated freely. Carcass searches were carried out daily at all turbines in June–October 2015. Electricity generation was reduced by 90 MWh/turbine at automated turbines during the study period.

    Study and other actions tested
Please cite as:

Berthinussen, A., Richardson O.C. and Altringham J.D. (2019) Bat Conservation. Pages 67-140 in: W.J. Sutherland, L.V. Dicks, N. Ockendon, S.O. Petrovan & R.K. Smith (eds) What Works in Conservation 2019. Open Book Publishers, Cambridge, UK.


Where has this evidence come from?

List of journals searched by synopsis

All the journals searched for all synopses

Bat Conservation

This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:

Bat Conservation

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust