Study

Carbon dioxide influences environmental sex determination in two species of turtles

  • Published source details Etchberger C.R., Ewert M.A., Phillips J.B. & Nelson C.E. (2002) Carbon dioxide influences environmental sex determination in two species of turtles. Amphibia-Reptilia, 23, 169-175.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Relocate nests/eggs for artificial incubation: Tortoises, terrapins, side-necked & softshell turtles

Action Link
Reptile Conservation
  1. Relocate nests/eggs for artificial incubation: Tortoises, terrapins, side-necked & softshell turtles

    A replicated study in 1992 in Pennsylvania, USA (Ewert et al. 2002) found that most artificially incubated pond slider Trachemys scripta and Mississippi map turtle Graptemys pseudogeographica kohni eggs hatched successfully, but higher CO2 concentrations during incubation led to lower hatching success for pond sliders in two of three comparisons and a higher proportion of female hatchlings for both species. Compared to 0% CO2, hatching success was lower at the highest concentration of CO2 for pond sliders (24 of 25 eggs at 0% CO2 vs 4 of 25 at 15% CO2; all with 21% oxygen), but remained similar at medium CO2 concentrations for both species (pond sliders: 21 of 25 at 10% CO2; map turtles: 12 of 14 at 0% CO2 vs 7 of 14 at 10% CO2; all with 21% oxygen). The proportion of males to females was lower at higher concentrations of CO2 for pond sliders (0%: 22:2; 10%: 11:12; 15%: 4:6) and map turtles (0%: 10:2; 10%: 3:6). A separate trial for pond slider eggs at high CO2 (15%) and 10% oxygen resulted in 0 of 24 eggs hatching successfully and a sex ratio of one male to six female embryos. In 1992, gravid, wild female turtles were injected with oxytocin to obtain their eggs. Groups of 25 pond slider eggs were incubated at 0, 10 or 15% CO2, and groups of 14 map turtle eggs were incubated at 0 or 10% CO2, all with 21% oxygen. A further 24 pond slider eggs were assigned to a treatment involving high CO2 (15%) and reduced oxygen levels (10%).

    (Summarised by: William Morgan)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust