Study

Reefcrete: reducing the environmental footprint of concretes for eco-engineering marine structures

  • Published source details Dennis H.D., Evans A.J., Banner A.J. & Moore P.J. (2018) Reefcrete: reducing the environmental footprint of concretes for eco-engineering marine structures. Ecological Engineering, 120, 668-678.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use environmentally-sensitive material on intertidal artificial structures

Action Link
Biodiversity of Marine Artificial Structures
  1. Use environmentally-sensitive material on intertidal artificial structures

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 2014–2015 on an intertidal rocky reef on open coastline in the Irish Sea, UK (Dennis et al. 2018) found that hemp-concrete and shell-concrete settlement plates supported higher macroalgae and invertebrate cover than standard-concrete plates, and that hemp-concrete supported higher species richness than shell- and standard-concrete plates, with different community composition to standard-concrete plates. After 12 months, macroalgae and non-mobile invertebrate cover was similar on hemp-concrete (92% cover) and shell-concrete (74%) plates, and higher on both than standard-concrete plates (25%). Mobile invertebrate species richness was higher on hemp-concrete (8 species groups/plate) than shell-concrete (4/plate) and standard-concrete (3/plate), which were similar. Macroalgae and non-mobile invertebrate species richness was similar on all materials (hemp: 7/plate; shell: 6/plate; standard: 5/plate). Macroalgae and invertebrate community composition differed on hemp-concrete and standard-concrete, but shell-concrete was similar to both (data reported as statistical model results). Settlement plates (150 × 150 mm) were moulded from hemp-concrete, shell-concrete and standard-concrete. Five of each were randomly arranged horizontally at mid-lowshore on a rocky reef in October 2014. Macroalgae and invertebrates on plates were counted in the laboratory after 12 months.

    (Summarised by: Ally Evans)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust