Study

Removal of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, from riparian forests influences headwater stream biota and ecosystem function

  • Published source details McNeish R.E., Moore E.M., Benbow M.E. & McEwan R.W. (2015) Removal of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, from riparian forests influences headwater stream biota and ecosystem function. River Research and Applications, 31, 1131-1139.

Summary

Action: Control problematic riparian plants

A controlled, before-and-after study in 2010–2012 of a headwater stream in Ohio, USA (McNeish et al. 2015) found that clearing non-native woody plants from the riparian zone had no significant effect on the biomass of algae growing on rocks in the stream. Over two years after intervention, algal biomass was statistically similar in a reach from which woody plants had been cleared (0–1.2 mg chl a/cm2) and a reach where woody plants had been left in place (0–1.8 mg chl a/cm2). This is despite a significantly lower canopy cover in the cleared reach (25–83%) than than the uncleared reach (70–97%). Before intervention, algal biomass was statistically similar in each treatment (0.1–0.2 mg chl a/cm2). Methods: In August–September 2010, non-native woody plants (mostly Amur honeysuckle Lonicera maackii) were cleared from the riparian forest along a 150-m-long river reach. Woody plants were cut down and removed, then glyphosate herbicide was applied to stumps. Non-native woody plants were left in a separate reach immediately upstream. Algae were surveyed monthly between July 2010 and May 2012 (scrubbed off five rocks/reach/survey, collected from riffles). Biomass was determined from chlorophyll a. Canopy cover was surveyed with a densitometer between May 2011 and July 2012.

 

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust