Study

Effects of repeated, early season, herbicide treatments of curlyleaf pondweed on native macrophyte assemblages in Minnesota lakes

  • Published source details Jones A.R., Johnson J.A. & Newman R.M. (2012) Effects of repeated, early season, herbicide treatments of curlyleaf pondweed on native macrophyte assemblages in Minnesota lakes. Lake and Reservoir Management, 28, 364-374.

Summary

Action: Use herbicide to control problematic plants

A replicated, controlled study in 2005–2009 of 11 lakes invaded by curly-leaf pondweed Potamogeton crispus in Minnesota, USA (Jones et al. 2012) reported that low-dose, spring herbicide treatments had no clear effect on the richness and abundance of native macrophytes over 1–4 growing seasons. Results summarized for this study are not based on assessments of statistical significance. Total richness (4–37 species/lake; 0.1–3.8 species/survey point), frequency (presence at 7–100% of survey points) and biomass (1–794 g/m2) of native macrophytes all fluctuated between years within lakes, with no clear and consistent differences in these fluctuations between treated and untreated lakes. The same was true for several individual taxa (see original paper for data). However, substantial increases in total biomass (>100% change from one year to next) were more common in treated lakes (5 of 15 comparisons) than in untreated lakes (1 of 8 comparisons). Methods: Between 2005 and 2009, endothall herbicide was added (in May) to eight invaded lakes (0.75–1.00 mg active ingredient/L in treated areas). Each lake received herbicide in at least three consecutive years. Three additional lakes were left untreated. Macrophytes (submerged, floating and emergent) were surveyed at 101–408 points/lake/year in August 2006–2009, i.e. 1–4 growing seasons after treatment began. All survey points were in water ≤4.6 m deep.

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust