Study

Comparison of the regeneration after burning, cutting and ploughing in a Cistus ladanifer shrubland

  • Published source details Tárrega R., Luis-Calabuig E. & Alonso I. (1995) Comparison of the regeneration after burning, cutting and ploughing in a Cistus ladanifer shrubland. Plant Ecology, 59-67.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Allow shrubland to regenerate without active management

Action Link
Shrubland and Heathland Conservation
  1. Allow shrubland to regenerate without active management

    A before-and-after study in 1989-1994 in rockrose shrublands in northern Spain (Tarrega et al. 1995) found that allowing shrubland to recover after severe disturbance without any active restoration increased the cover of woody plants, reduced the number of species and cover of herbaceous plants, but did not increase the number of woody plant species after five years. In three of three cases, after five years, cover of woody plants in plots was higher (50-64% cover) than the in same plots immediately after they were disturbed (1-25% cover), but was lower than the same plots before they were disturbed (79-91% cover). In three of three cases the number and cover of herbaceous species after five years was lower (species: 2-7; cover: 2-12%) than that immediately after disturbance (species: 6-16; cover: 17-61%), but cover after five years was higher than herbaceous cover prior to disturbance (0-3% cover). However, in three of three cases the number of woody species did not differ significantly after five years (2-3 species) and the same areas immediately after disturbance (1-3 species). Three 100 m2 plots were established in the shrublands in 1989 and were either burnt, ploughed, or cut. Each year in 1989-1994 five 1 m2 quadrats were placed in each plot and vegetation estimated visually.

    (Summarised by: Phil Martin)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust