Study

Field trials of an acoustic decoy to attract sperm whales away from commercial longline fishing vessels in western Gulf of Alaska

  • Published source details Wild L., Thode A., Straley J., Rhoads S., Falvey D. & Liddle J. (2017) Field trials of an acoustic decoy to attract sperm whales away from commercial longline fishing vessels in western Gulf of Alaska. Fisheries Research, 196, 141-150.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use acoustic decoys to divert mammals away from fishing gear

Action Link
Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation
  1. Use acoustic decoys to divert mammals away from fishing gear

    A study in 2013 in a pelagic area in the western Gulf of Alaska, USA (Wild et al. 2017) found that increasing the distance between an acoustic decoy device and fishing lines resulted in fewer sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus at the lines, but sperm whale presence and time of arrival did not differ. Deploying acoustic decoy devices at greater distances from fishing lines resulted in fewer sperm whales at the lines during hauls (data reported as statistical model results). However, the distance between the decoy and fishing line did not have a significant effect on sperm whale presence during hauls or the time it took for sperm whales to arrive after hauling commenced. An acoustic decoy device was deployed at various distances (between 1.6 and 12.4 km) from ‘long line’ fishing lines (average 5 km in length) targeting sablefish Anoplopoma fimbria during a total of 14 deployments. The acoustic device (an underwater speaker attached to a buoy, 20 m deep) played recordings of vessel hauling sounds. Acoustic recorders deployed below the decoy and each fishing line at a depth of 100 m recorded sperm whale vocalizations. Fishers recorded sperm whale sightings and evidence of predation during each of the 14 hauls in June–July 2013.

    (Summarised by: Anna Berthinussen)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust