Study

Pingers as deterrents of bottlenose dolphins interacting with trammel nets

  • Published source details Gazo M., Gonzalvo J. & Aguilar A. (2008) Pingers as deterrents of bottlenose dolphins interacting with trammel nets. Fisheries Research, 92, 70-75.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use acoustic devices on fishing gear

Action Link
Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation
  1. Use acoustic devices on fishing gear

    A controlled study in 2001 of a pelagic area in the Mediterranean Sea, off the Balearic Islands, Spain (Gazo et al. 2008) found that using acoustic devices on fishing nets reduced damage to nets and fish caused by common bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus. Fishing nets with active acoustic devices had significantly fewer holes (average 1 hole/net) than nets with inactive acoustic devices (average 8 holes/net) or no devices (average 6 holes/net). The percentage of caught fish bitten by dolphins was also lower in nets with active devices (7%) compared to inactive devices (13%) or no devices (17%), although statistical significance was not assessed. Catch rates of target red mullet Mullus surmuletus did not differ significantly between nets with active devices (0.6 kg/net), inactive devices (0.7 kg/net) and no devices (0.9 kg/net). A total of 55 trammel net deployments (each with multiple nets, 50 m long x 2 m high, tied together) were deployed across a fishing area (340 km2). One of three treatments was rotated between deployments: active acoustic devices attached (27 deployments), inactive (silent) acoustic devices attached (16 deployments) or no devices (12 deployments). Acoustic devices (Aquatec AQUAmark 100; emitting eight different signals of 5–30 second duration at 20–160 kHz) were attached at 150 m intervals. An observer on board each of three fishing vessels recorded fish catches, dolphin-damaged fish and new holes in the nets during each of the 55 hauls in September–October 2001.

    (Summarised by: Anna Berthinussen)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust