Study

Influence of grid orientation and time of day on grid sorting in a small-meshed trawl fishery for Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii)

  • Published source details Eigaard O.R., Herrmann B. & Nielsen J.R. (2012) Influence of grid orientation and time of day on grid sorting in a small-meshed trawl fishery for Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii). Aquatic Living Resources, 25, 15-26.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Fit a size-sorting escape grid (rigid or flexible) to a fish trawl net

Action Link
Marine Fish Conservation
  1. Fit a size-sorting escape grid (rigid or flexible) to a fish trawl net

    A replicated study in 2007 of a fished area of seabed in the North Sea off northeast Scotland, UK (Eigaard et al. 2012) reported that fish trawl nets fitted with a rigid size-sorting escape grid allowed high proportions of non-target haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus and whiting Merlangius merlangus to escape and around half of all herring Clupea harengus in an industrial fishery for the smaller-sized species Norway pout Trisopterus esmarkii. Data were reported as percentage escapes and results were not tested for statistical significance. The percentage of haddock and whiting excluded from the trawl by the grid was 93–100% and 81–100% respectively. The percentage of herring that escaped capture was 40–62%. The effect was similar for trawls during the day or night, and for grids facing either forwards or backwards. Loss of target pout was 6–14%. In November/December 2007, data were collected from 14 trawl deployments done on two, nine-day fishing trials on the Fladen Ground, a traditional Norway pout fishing ground. A trawl net fitted with a 180 x 130 cm fibreglass grid with 23 mm bar spacing, mounted at 60° angle, and either facing forwards with a top escape opening (five tows) or backwards with a bottom escape opening (nine tows) was tested. A cover collected catch passing through the escape outlet. Trawls were towed for 8 h at 3.1 knots and 131–144 m depths.

    (Summarised by: Leo Clarke)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust