Study

The effects of partial root removal and soil moisture regime on Nuttall oak Quercus nuttallii seedling growth: a laboratory experiment, University of Memphis, Tennessee, USA

  • Published source details Farmer J.W. & Pezeshki S.R. (2004) Effects of periodic flooding and root pruning on Quercus nuttallii seedlings. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 12, 205-214

Summary

In the southern USA, much emphasis in bottomland hardwood restoration is placed on establishing an oak-dominated forest. Regeneration of deforested areas and where a desirable seed source is not present, by planting nursery-grown seedlings is one available reforestation technique. Currently the usual procedure for seedling preparation is to prune the roots prior to transplanting in the field. However, it is not fully known what effect(s) root pruning has on transplanted seedlings. Secondly, bottomland restoration efforts inherently take place on floodplains, but the potential interaction between root pruning and flooding on seedling performance is not known. This study consisted of two separate but related laboratory experiments. The first experiment, a quantification of the effects of various amounts of root removal and varying soil moisture regimes on transplanted Nuttall oak Quercus nuttallii seedlings, is summarised here.

(For a summary of the effects of varying degrees of root pruning on new root formation of Nuttall oak Quercus nuttallii seedlings, please see: http://www.conservationevidence.com/ViewEntry.asp?ID=1026).

One hundred and fifty bareroot Nuttall oak seedlings were obtained from a State nursery at Pinson, Tennessee, 48 of similar size were selected for root pruning.

Root pruning treatments consisted of removal of roots at 0%, 25% and 75%, after which seedlings were placed in 2.5 l plastic pots in a sand/field soil (1:2) mix. A soil moisture regime of non-flooded or periodically flooded conditions, was maintained. The seedlings were randomly arranged in the laboratory under artificial lighting.

Plant gas exchange, growth, and survival were measured up to 108 days after root pruning.

Root pruning alone had adverse effects on height growth during the first 72 days following transplanting (no pruning c. 10 cm cumulative height growth; 75% pruning c.7 cm growth; 25% pruning 5 cm growth). Periodic flooding also produced adverse effects on stomatal conductance, height growth and survival.

As pruning intensified in the periodically flooded seedlings, photosynthetic rates decreased. In contrast, as pruning intensified in the non-flooded seedlings, photosynthesis increased. This demonstrated that pruning rate had a varying effect on photosynthesis dependent upon soil moisture conditions.


Conclusions: Results indicated that root pruning had no detectable long-term adverse effects on growth and survival of seedlings under drained soil conditions; however, if seedlings were planted in periodically flooded conditions, root pruning produced adverse effects. This indicates that if using oak seedling transplants in restoration efforts, the planting strategy and pruning rate should be evaluated based on the knowledge of hydrology of the site to be planted. Alternatively, on sites with unpredictable flooding both pruned and unpruned seedlings may be used to ensure survival, or placed in appropriate zones more liable or less liable to flooding.


Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/r57x616340182417/fulltext.pdf

 

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust