Study

Giant mud crab (Scylla serrata): relative efficiencies of common baited traps and impacts on discards

  • Published source details Butcher P.A., Leland J.C., Broadhurst M.K., Paterson B.D. & Mayer D.G. (2012) Giant mud crab (Scylla serrata): relative efficiencies of common baited traps and impacts on discards. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 69, 1511-1522

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Modify fishing trap/pot configuration

Action Link
Marine Fish Conservation
  1. Modify fishing trap/pot configuration

    A replicated study in 2010 of mud and sand seabed in two estuaries in the Solitary Islands Marine Park in the Tasman Sea, Australia (Butcher et al. 2012) found that the number of unwanted fish caught in traps in a mud crab Scylla serrata fishery was lower in three of four trap designs. Across six days of fishing, unwanted fish catches (consisting mainly of yellowfin bream Acanthopagrus australis) in hoop nets (3 fish), rectangular pots (9 fish) and wire pots (5 fish) were lower than in round pots (287 fish). In addition, all trap designs retained similar sizes of commercial target mud crabs (8–19 cm). Between February and June 2010, five traps of each of four designs were deployed for three, six or 24 hours across six days of fishing. Designs were: steel-framed hoop traps (0.75 m diameter × 0.65 m, 150 mm mesh), rectangular collapsible plastic pots (0.88 × 0.55 × 0.20 m) with “V” shaped entrances, rectangular wire pots (0.90 × 0.60 × 0.30 m) with 50 x 0.75 mm wire mesh and two funnel entrances, and round, collapsible plastic pots (0.90 m diameter × 0.27 m) with four funnel entrances. All traps complied with existing regulations and were baited with sea mullet Mugil cephalus in a 10 × 10 mm mesh bag, and deployed 50–100 m apart.

    (Summarised by: Leo Clarke)

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust