Study

The effect of escape vents on the capture of black sea bass, Centropristis striata, in fish traps

  • Published source details Shepherd G.R., Moore C.W. & Seagraves R.J. (2002) The effect of escape vents on the capture of black sea bass, Centropristis striata, in fish traps. Fisheries Research, 54, 195-207.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Modify fishing trap/pot configuration

Action Link
Marine Fish Conservation
  1. Modify fishing trap/pot configuration

    A replicated, randomised, controlled study in 1994 of an area of shallow seabed in the Atlantic Ocean off Delaware, USA (Shepherd et al. 2002) found that fish traps modified with escape vents reduced the unwanted catch of undersized black sea bass Centropristis striata compared to traps without escape vents. Across all escape vent sizes, catch rates of bass (all sizes) were lower in traps with vents than without (with: 2–11 bass/trap, without: 10–14 bass/trap) and the average bass size was greater (with: 27 cm: without: 25 cm). The proportion of undersized (<24 cm) bass in traps with vents was reduced by 72–95% compared to without, and the reduction increased with increasing vent size (2.9 cm: 288 bass, 3.2 cm: 80 bass, 3.5 cm: 59, 3.8 cm: 48 bass, no vent: 1,037 bass). Data were collected from 893 trap deployments (18–27 m) during nine trips between May-November 1994. Traps were deployed along lines (strings) of 25 traps in blocks of five trap designs, four with escape vents of different sizes (2.3 cm, 3.2 cm, 3.5 cm and 3.8 cm) and one standard trap without vents. Four strings of 25 traps were set/trip and traps were randomly positioned within a block. Strings were set 5 miles apart and left for 12–32 days before retrieval.

    (Summarised by: Chris Barrett)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust