Study

Effects of 17/0 circle hooks and bait on fish catches in a Southern Atlantic swordfish longline fishery

  • Published source details Amorim S., Santos M.N., Coelho R. & Fernandez-Carvalho J. (2015) Effects of 17/0 circle hooks and bait on fish catches in a Southern Atlantic swordfish longline fishery. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 25, 518-533.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use a different hook type

Action Link
Marine Fish Conservation
  1. Use a different hook type

    A replicated, controlled study in 2008–2012 in a wide area of pelagic water spanning the Southern Atlantic Ocean (Amorim et al. 2015) found that using two circle hook types instead of a traditional J hook in a commercial longline fishery targeting swordfish Xiphias gladius, reduced the overall discarded catch of bony fish, but not sharks and rays (Elasmobranchii), and the effects varied between species. Average catch rates of total discarded bony fish (five species/groups) were lower on circle hooks than J hooks (circle: 0.8–0.9, J hook: 1.8 ind/1,000 hooks), but this varied between individual species. Catch rates of all shark and ray discards (nine species/groups) did not differ between hook types (circle: 2.3–2.6, J hook: 2.3 ind/1,000 hooks), but there were also differences for individual species (see original paper for species individual data). Data were collected from 310 experimental longline sets, deployed from October 2008 to February 2012. Three different hook types were tested: two circle hooks of identical dimensions, but one with no offset angle and one offset by 10°, and one existing J-style hook used by the Portuguese swordfish pelagic longline fleet (see original paper for gear specifications). A total of 446,400 hooks were fished, baited with mackerel Scomber spp. and squid Illex spp., with hook types alternated in groups of 80 hooks.

    (Summarised by: Chris Barrett/Natasha Taylor)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust