Study

Effects of circle versus J-style hooks on target and non-target species in a pelagic longline fishery

  • Published source details Kerstetter D.W. & Graves J.E. (2006) Effects of circle versus J-style hooks on target and non-target species in a pelagic longline fishery. Fisheries Research, 80, 239-250.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use a different hook type

Action Link
Marine Fish Conservation
  1. Use a different hook type

    A replicated, controlled study in 2003–2004 in an area of pelagic water in the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico (Kerstetter & Graves 2006) found that changing conventional J-shaped hooks to circle hooks did not typically reduce the catches or mortality of non-target fish species in a longline fishery, but deep-hooking (associated with post-release mortality) was reduced. Across both surveys, catch rates of one of seven non-target fish species were lower on circle hooks than J hooks (see original paper for species individual data). The percentage mortality was lower on circle hooks than J hooks for only one of the 10 most commonly caught non-target species in both 2003 (circle: 7%, J hook: 30%) and 2004 (circle: 26%, J hook: 58%). However, the occurrence of deep-hooking was lower on circle hooks than J hooks for four of five species (data reported as statistical model results). Data were collected on a commercial pelagic longline vessel in the tuna Thunnus spp. and/or swordfish Xiphias gladius fisheries during two surveys: July-September 2003 (39 longline sets, using squid Ilex sp. as bait) and January-April 2004 (46 sets, mixed squid/mackerel Scomber scombrus bait). One circle hook type (size 16/0) and one J-shaped hook type (size 9/0) were set alternately on longline sections (30,600 hooks). See original paper for gear specifications.

    (Summarised by: Leo Clarke)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 19

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust