Study

Impact of winter reed harvesting and burning on the nutrient economy of reed beds

  • Published source details Ostendorp W. (1995) Impact of winter reed harvesting and burning on the nutrient economy of reed beds. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 3, 233-248.

Summary

This study was conducted to determine if winter reed Phragmites australis harvesting and burning is an effective strategy to reduce the nutrient input within reedbeds; it has been hypothesized that repeated treatment would cause the reed vegetation to become nutrient limited, and reduce reed vitality. Accordingly this might enhance growing conditions for endangered wetland plants. Over four years, reed harvesting and burning experiments were undertaken at Lake Constance-Untersee with the objective of reducing organic matter and nutrient content of the top layers of the sediment. Whether oxygen conditions in within-reedbed waterbodies improved was also investigated.

Study area: The experiment was undertaken in reedbeds around the western part of Lake Constance-Untersee (a shallow eutrophic lake), southwest Germany.

Mowing and burning: Mowing and burning experiments were conducted during winter months when the water level was low and the ground frozen, between 1979 and 1984. The mowing was done by various caterpillar-tracked machines with an interchangeable mowing and chaffing device, with resultant chaffed reed and litter removed by hand or machine. Where burnt, ash was left on the ground.

Monitoring: Six treated reed beds and three control beds over a period of up to 4 years were monitored by sampling along cross-shore transects extending from the reed front to the mixed Phragmites-Carex-Phalaris zone along the landward edge.

The sediment top layer (0 to 2.5 cm depth) below the Phragmites litter was sampled in winter and analyzed for organic matter, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus. The dry matter content of a sediment core of 4 cm diameter and 2.5 cm thickness was used to calculate bulk density (kg dry matter per m² in the 1 cm sediment surface layer). Water samples were taken from within reedbed waterbodies and analysed.

Over the 4 years of the experiment, the surface sediment/water system of the reed beds was found to be well buffered against the removal of the current year's dead Phragmites straw/litter, as only slight, and mostly insignificant, differences between treated and untreated reedbeds were detected.

There were no obvious differences in the bottom water layer (taken at 5 cm above the lake bed) between winter harvested and untreated reed beds and it seems that very local circumstances influence the hydrochemical properties more than the treatment.

As a result of these findings, the author concludes that (over the limited time period of the experiment at least) the benefit of winter reed harvesting/burning as a means to reduce nutrient levels within reedbeds remain dubious, and harvesting had little influence on water conditions.


Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/q41651r307936114/fulltext.pdf

 

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust