Conservation Evidence strives to be as useful to conservationists as possible. Please take our survey to help the team improve our resource.

Providing evidence to improve practice

Individual study: Relationships between husbandry methods and sheep losses to canine predators

Published source details

Robel R.J., Dayton A.D., Henderson F.R., Meduna R.L. & Spaeth C.W. (1981) Relationships between husbandry methods and sheep losses to canine predators. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 45, 894-911

This study is summarised as evidence for the intervention(s) shown on the right. The icon shows which synopsis it is relevant to.

Dispose of livestock carcasses to deter predation of livestock by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Terrestrial Mammal Conservation

A site comparison study in 1975–1976 of 97 sheep farms in Kansas, USA (Robel et al. 1981) found that when sheep carcasses were buried or removed, sheep losses to coyotes Canis latrans and dogs Canis lupus familiaris were reduced compared to leaving them on the pasture, but burning carcasses did not reduce predation. The proportion of sheep lost to coyotes or dogs each month was lower when carcasses were buried (0.05%) or removed (0.08%) than when they were left in place (0.14%). The rate when carcasses were burned (0.17%) did not differ from that of leaving them in place. Ninety-seven farms were studied, on which total sheep numbers varied through the study period from 14,578 to 17,023. Farmers recorded monthly sheep losses and husbandry methods for 15 months.

(Summarised by Phil Martin)