Study

Complementary use by vertebrates of crossing structures along a fenced Spanish motorway

  • Published source details Mata C., Hervàs I., Herranz J., Suàrez F. & Malo J.E. (2005) Complementary use by vertebrates of crossing structures along a fenced Spanish motorway. Biological Conservation, 124, 397-405.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Install overpasses over roads/railways

Action Link
Reptile Conservation

Install overpasses over roads/railways

Action Link
Terrestrial Mammal Conservation

Install barriers and crossing structures along roads/railways

Action Link
Reptile Conservation

Install barrier fencing and underpasses along roads

Action Link
Terrestrial Mammal Conservation
  1. Install overpasses over roads/railways

    A replicated study in 2002 of a highway in Zamora, Spain (Mata et al. 2005, same experimental set-up as Mata et al. 2008) found that wildlife and other overpasses were used by reptiles. Lacertid lizards (Lacerta spp. and Podarcis spp.) were recorded crossing wildlife overpasses (0.5 crossings/day/structure) and lacertids and ophidians (snakes and legless lacertids) were also recorded crossing other overpasses, such as rural tracks (lacertids: 0.4 crossings/day/structure, ophidians: 0.1). Two wildlife overpasses (16 m wide, 60 m long) and 16 general overpasses (rural tracks, 7–8 m wide, 58–62 m long) were monitored along a 72 km section of the A-52 motorway. The motorway had barrier fencing along its length. Marble dust (1 m wide across) was used to record animal tracks for 10 days in June–September 2002. Camera traps were installed on some overpasses.

    (Summarised by: Maggie Watson, Katie Sainsbury)

  2. Install overpasses over roads/railways

    A study in 2002 in along a road in Zamora, Spain (Mata et al. 2005) found that wildlife overpasses were used by mammals. Overpasses were used by red deer Cervus elaphus (detected at wildlife overpasses on average of 2/10 days), small mammals (shrews, mice and voles; detected 1.0/10 days) and rabbits and hares (detected 4.5/10 days). Other overpasses, such as rural tracks, were used by small mammals (detected 6.4/10 days), rabbits and hares (3.3/10) and foxes Vulpes vulpes (1.4/10), but not by red deer. Two wildlife overpasses (16 m wide, 60 m long) and 16 general overpasses (rural tracks, 7–8 m wide, 58–62 m long) were monitored along a 72-km section of the A-52 motorway. The motorway had barrier fencing along its length. Marble dust (1 m wide cross) was used to record animal tracks for 10 days in June–September 2002. Camera traps were installed on some overpasses.

    (Summarised by: Rebecca K. Smith)

  3. Install barriers and crossing structures along roads/railways

    A replicated study in 2002 of a highway in Zamora, Spain (Mata et al. 2005; same experimental set-up as Mata et al. 2008) found that underpasses and culverts, in areas with roadside barrier fencing, were used by reptiles. Lacertid lizards (Lacerta spp. and Podarcis spp.) and ophidians (snakes and legless lacertids) were recorded in circular culverts (lacertids: 1.49 crossings/day/structure, ophidians: 0.03), adapted culverts (1, 0.5), and open-span underpasses (0.07, 0.07). Lacertid lizards were also recorded in wildlife underpasses (0.86 crossings/day/structure). A total of 64 underpasses and culverts (30–150 m long) under a 72 km section of motorway were monitored. These included 33 circular drainage culverts (2 m diameter), 10 wildlife-adapted box culverts (2–3 m wide, 2 m high), 14 open-span underpasses (rural tracks/paths, 4–9 m wide, 4–6 m high) and seven wildlife underpasses (20 m wide, 5–7 m high). The motorway was barrier-fenced. Animal tracks were monitored over 10 days in June–September 2002 using marble dust (1 m wide across).

    (Summarised by: Maggie Watson, Katie Sainsbury)

  4. Install barrier fencing and underpasses along roads

    A study in 2002 of a highway in Zamora, Spain (Mata et al. 2005; same experimental set-up as Mata et al. 2008) found that underpasses and culverts, in areas with roadside barrier fencing, were used by mammals. Circular culverts were used by hedgehog Erinaceus europaeus, garden dormouse Eliomys quercinus, badger Meles meles, common genet Genetta genetta and red fox Vulpes vulpes. Adapted (enlarged) culverts were used by red squirrel Sciurus vulgaris, badger and red fox. Open-span underpasses were used by hedgehog, badger, red fox and red deer Cervus elaphus. Wildlife underpasses were used by hedgehog, badger, common genet and red fox. Crossings were also used by rodents and shrews, rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus, Iberian hare Lepus granatensis, weasel Mustela nivalis, European wildcat Felis silvestris and wolf Canis lupus (see paper for details). Sixty-four underpasses/culverts (30–150 m long) under a 72-km section of motorway were monitored. These included 33 circular drainage culverts (2 m diameter), 10 wildlife-adapted box culverts (2–3 m wide, 2 m high), 14 open-span underpasses (rural tracks/paths, 4–9 m wide, 4–6 m high) and seven wildlife underpasses (20 m wide, 5–7 m high). The motorway was barrier-fenced. Animal tracks were monitored over 10 days in June–September 2002 using marble dust (1-m-wide cross). Camera traps verified species identifications in some underpasses.

    (Summarised by: Rebecca K. Smith)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust