Study

Biology and control of parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum) in Portugal

  • Published source details Moreira I., Monteira A. & Ferreira T. (1999) Biology and control of parrotfeather (Myriophyllum aquaticum) in Portugal. Ecology Environment and Conservation, 5, 171-179

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - diquat

Action Link
Control of Freshwater Invasive Species

Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - other herbicides

Action Link
Control of Freshwater Invasive Species

Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - 2,4-D

Action Link
Control of Freshwater Invasive Species

Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - other herbicides

Action Link
Control of Freshwater Invasive Species

Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - 2,4-D

Action Link
Control of Freshwater Invasive Species

Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - other herbicides

Action Link
Control of Freshwater Invasive Species
  1. Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - diquat

    A replicated, randomized, controlled, field study conducted in summer 1986 in Portugal (Moreira et al. 1999) found that the application of the herbicide diquat did not reduce the biomass of parrot’s feather Myriophyllum aquaticum. For three out of three comparisons, the fresh weight of parrot’s feather plants treated with diquat did not differ from untreated plants (15–25 vs 22–26 kg/m2). Additionally, the biomass of parrot’s feather plants treated with diquat (15–25 kg/m2) was higher than that of plants treated with 2,4-D amine (2–9 kg/m2) for three out of three comparisons, was higher than that of plants treated with gluphosinate-ammonium (9–22 kg/m2) for five out of nine comparisons, and was higher than of plants treated with glyphosate (9–14 kg/m2) for two out of three comparisons. Parrot’s feather biomass was assessed in 20 x 7 m plots and each herbicide rate was tested in four replicates. Herbicide rates were 2 kg/ha for diquat, 6.5 kg/ha for 2,4-D amine, 1–2.4 kg/ha for gluphosinate-ammonium and 3.6 kg/ha for glyphosate.

  2. Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - other herbicides

    A replicated, randomized, controlled, field study conducted in summer 1986 in Portugal (Moreira et al. 2010), found that the application of the herbicide glyphosate reduced the biomass of parrot’s feather Myriophyllum aquaticum. For two out of three comparisons, the fresh weight of plants treated with glyphosate was reduced relative to untreated plants (9–14 vs 22–26 kg/m2). Additionally, four and a half months after treatment, the biomass of parrot’s feather plants treated with glyphosate (13 kg/m2) was higher than plants treated with 2,4-D amine (2.2 kg/m2), but lower than plants treated with diquat (18 kg/m2). Parrot’s feather biomass was assessed in 20 x 7 m plots, with four replicates of each herbicide. Herbicide rates were 2 kg/ha for diquat, 6.5 kg/ha for 2,4-D amine, 1–2.4 kg/ha for gluphosinate-ammonium and 3.6 kg/ha for glyphosate. Herbicide was applied twice in the same area.

  3. Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - 2,4-D

    A replicated, randomized, controlled, field study conducted in summer 1986 in Portugal (Moreira et al. 1999) found that the application of the herbicide 2,4-D amine reduced the biomass of parrot’s feather Myriophyllum aquaticum. For three out of three comparisons, the fresh weight of parrot’s feather plants treated with 2,4-D amine was lower relative to untreated plants (2–9 vs 22–26 kg/m2). Additionally, four and a half months after treatment, the biomass of plants treated with 2,4-D amine (2.2 kg/m2) was significantly lower than that of plants treated with diquat (18 kg/m2), gluphosinate-ammonium (14–15 kg/m2) and glyphosate (13 kg/m2). Parrot’s feather biomass was assessed in 20 x 7 m plots and each herbicide rate was tested in four replicates. Herbicide rates were 6.5 kg/ha for 2,4-D amine, 2 kg/ha for diquat, 1–2.4 kg/ha for gluphosinate-ammonium and 3.6 kg/ha for glyphosate.

  4. Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - other herbicides

    A replicated, controlled field study conducted in autumn 1995 in Portugal (Moreira et al. 2010) found that the application of the herbicide dichlobenil led to a smaller reduction in the cover of parrot’s feather Myriophyllum aquaticum than the combined application of the herbicides 2,4-D and MCPA eight days after treatment but not 45 days after application. Eight days after treatment, the cover of parrot’s feather plants treated with dichlobenil (85% cover) was higher than of plants treated with a combination of 2,4-D and MCPA (10%). However, after 45 days, the cover of plants treated with dichlobenil at a rate of 4.1 kg/ha (20%) was lower than of plants treated with a dicholobenil at a rate of 2.7 kg/ha (60%) or with a combination of 2,4-D and MCPA (60%). Each herbicide rate was sprayed onto three plots of 100 m2. Herbicide concentration was 520 g and 520 g/l for 2,4-D + MCPA respectively.

  5. Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - 2,4-D

    A replicated, controlled field study conducted in autumn 1995 in Portugal (Moreira et al. 1999) found that the combined application of the herbicides 2,4-D and MCPA led to a greater reduction of the cover of parrot’s feather Myriophyllum aquaticum than the application of the herbicide dichlobenil eight days after treatment but not 45 days after application. Eight days after treatment, the cover of parrot’s feather plants treated with a combination of 2,4-D and MCPA was lower than of plants treated with dichlobenil (10% vs 85%). However, after 45 days, the cover of plants treated with 2,4-D and MCPA was higher than that of plants treated with dichlobenil at a rate of 4.1 kg/ha (60% vs 20%). Each herbicide rate was sprayed onto three plots of 100 m2. Herbicide rates were 2.7 kg/ha and 4.1 kg/ha for dichlobenil and 520 g and 520 g/l for 2,4-D and MCPA respectively.

  6. Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - other herbicides

    A replicated, randomized, controlled, field study conducted in summer 1986 in three drainage channels Portugal (Moreira et al. 2010) found that the application of the herbicide gluphosinate-ammonium reduced the biomass of parrot’s feather Myriophyllum aquaticum in five out of nine comparisons. For five out of nine comparisons, the fresh weight of parrot’s feather plants treated with gluphosinate-ammonium was reduced relative to untreated plants (9–22 vs 22–26 kg/m2). Additionally, four and a half months after treatment, the biomass of parrot’s feather plants treated with gluphosinate-ammonium (14–15 kg/m2) was higher than plants treated with 2,4-D amine (2.2 kg/m2) but lower than plants treated with glyphosate (13 kg/m2). Parrot’s feather biomass was assessed in 20 x 7 m plots and each herbicide rate was tested in four replicates. Herbicide rates were 2 kg/ha for diquat, 6.5 kg/ha for 2,4-D amine, 1–2.4 kg/ha for gluphosinate-ammonium and 3.6 kg/ha for glyphosate. Herbicide was applied twice in the same area.

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust