Evaluation of buffers to improve the quality of runoff from irrigated pastures

  • Published source details Tate K.W., Nader G.A., Lewis D.J., Atwill E.R. & Connor J.M. (2000) Evaluation of buffers to improve the quality of runoff from irrigated pastures. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (SWCS), 55, 473-478.


This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Water: Plant buffer strips

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland
  1. Water: Plant buffer strips

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 1997 in irrigated pastures in the foothills of the Sierra Nevadas, California, USA, found less sediment in runoff from pastures with buffers. Water availability: Similar amounts of water were lost as runoff from plots with or without buffers (118–1,386 vs 121–893 m3/ha). Nutrients: Similar amounts of nitrate and phosphorus were found in runoff from pastures with or without buffers (sprinkler: 1.78 vs 1.76 kg NO3-N/ha; 0.34 vs 0.38 kg total P/ha; flood: 0.91 vs 1.34 kg NO3-N/ha; 0.24 vs 0.23 kg total P/ha). Sediments: Less sediment was found in runoff from pastures with buffers, compared to pastures without buffers, in two of four comparisons (0.3 vs 0.4–0.16 g total suspended solids/litre). Methods: Buffers (10 m width, parallel to the stream channel or runoff ditch in which runoff was measured) were fenced to exclude grazers on 1 May 1997. Pastures and buffers were 40% clover and 60% grass. Four pastures had buffers, and four did not. Half of the pastures (1 ha each) were intensively sprinkler-irrigated and grazed (six cattle, five-day rotation). The other half (3 ha each) were flood-irrigated and grazed (20 cattle, seven-day rotation). The cattle were yearling beef heifers, in rotation from 1 June to 15 October. Runoff was measured during irrigation events (sprinkler: five events, 787 m3/ha/event; flood: eight events, 1,642 m3/ha/event) in August, September, and October (volume was measured every 15 minutes in a weir; samples were collected every hour).


Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust