Study

Effects of compost input and tillage intensity on soil microbial biomass and activity under Mediterranean conditions

  • Published source details Laudicina V.A., Badalucco L. & Palazzolo E. (2011) Effects of compost input and tillage intensity on soil microbial biomass and activity under Mediterranean conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 47, 63-70.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Soil: Use reduced tillage in arable fields

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland
  1. Soil: Use reduced tillage in arable fields

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 2000–2009 on a farm in Sicily, Italy, found more organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, and soil organisms in soils with reduced tillage, compared to conventional tillage. Organic matter: More organic carbon was found in soils with reduced tillage, compared to conventional tillage (8–16 vs 6–11 g C/kg soil). Nutrients: More nitrogen or phosphorus was found in soils with reduced tillage, compared to conventional tillage, in one of two comparisons (2.2 vs 1.7 g N/kg soil; 20 vs 11 mg phosphorus/kg soil). Soil organisms: More microbial biomass (measured as carbon) was found in soils with reduced tillage, compared to conventional tillage (334–680 vs 241–464 mg C/kg soil), and more microbial biomass (measured as nitrogen) was found in one of two comparisons (102 vs 78 mg N/kg soil). Greenhouse gases: Similar amounts of carbon dioxide were found in soils with reduced tillage, compared to conventional tillage (69–71 vs 109–111 mg C-CO2/kg soil). Methods: Conventional tillage or reduced tillage was used on eight plots each (20 x 15 m plots), in 2000–2009. A mouldboard plough (20 cm depth) was used for both conventional tillage (6–8 ploughings/year) and reduced tillage (one ploughing/year, plus hoeing to control weeds). Compost was added to all plots (15–30 t/ha/year). Soil samples were collected in May 2009 (five sub-samples/plot, 0–20 cm depth).

     

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust