Study

Denitrification from an irrigated soil fertilized with pig slurry under Mediterranean conditions

  • Published source details Vallejo A., Díez J.A., López-Valdivia L.M., Cartagena M.C., Tarquis A. & Hernaiz P. (2004) Denitrification from an irrigated soil fertilized with pig slurry under Mediterranean conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 40, 93-100.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Soil: Add slurry to the soil

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland

Water: Use organic fertilizer instead of inorganic

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland
  1. Soil: Add slurry to the soil

    A replicated, controlled study in 1998–1999 in irrigated arable farmland in Spain found more nitrate in soils with added slurry, compared to soils without it. Nutrients: More nitrate was found in soils with added slurry, compared to soils without it (40–90 vs 10–22 mg/kg). Methods: Plots (10 × 11 m) had added pig slurry (165 kg/ha) or no added fertilizer (three replicates each). Slurry was incorporated into the soil, five days after application, using a rotocultivator (0–5 cm depth). Soil samples were taken during the first 15 days after application and every 2 weeks thereafter.

     

  2. Water: Use organic fertilizer instead of inorganic

    A replicated, controlled study in 1998–1999 in an irrigated maize field in Spain found that similar amounts of nitrogen were lost from plots with organic or inorganic fertilizer. Nutrients: Similar amounts of nitrogen were lost from plots with organic or inorganic fertilizer added (2.3–2.5 vs 2.5–2.9 g/m2). Methods: Plots (10 × 11 m) had pig slurry (165 kg/ha) or urea (165 kg/ha) (three plots each). Slurry was incorporated into the soil, five days after application, using a rotocultivator (0–5 cm depth). Water samples were taken during the first 15 days after application and every 2 weeks thereafter.

     

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust