Study

Isoelectric focusing of β-glucosidase humic-bound activity in semi-arid Mediterranean soils under management practices

  • Published source details Doni S., Macci C., Chen H., Masciandaro G. & Ceccanti B. (2012) Isoelectric focusing of β-glucosidase humic-bound activity in semi-arid Mediterranean soils under management practices. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 48, 183-190

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Soil: Add manure to the soil

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland

Soil: Use organic fertilizer instead of inorganic

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland
  1. Soil: Add manure to the soil

    A replicated, controlled study in 2006 in an almond orchard in Italy found more organic matter, nitrogen, and higher pH levels in plots with added manure, compared to plots without added manure. Organic matter: More carbon was found in plots with added manure, compared to plots without added manure, in four of six comparisons (8,173–9,420 vs 7,339–8,263 mg/kg). Nutrients: More nitrogen was found in plots with added manure (1,027–1,280 vs 727–827 mg/kg). Higher pH levels were found in plots with added manure, in one of six comparisons (8.57 vs 8.31). Methods: Plots (495 m2) had manure pellets (1.5 t/ha) or no fertilizer (three plots for each). Plots were drip-irrigated (2,000 m³/ha/year). Soil samples were collected in 2006 (five samples/plot, 0–15 cm depth).

     

  2. Soil: Use organic fertilizer instead of inorganic

    A replicated, controlled study in 2006 in an almond orchard in Italy found more carbon and nitrogen, and higher pH levels, in plots with organic fertilizer, compared to inorganic fertilizer. Organic matter: More carbon was found in soils with organic fertilizer, compared to inorganic fertilizer, in seven of 12 comparisons (8,173–9,420 vs 7,307–8,740 mg/kg). Nutrients: More nitrogen was found in soils with organic fertilizer, compared to inorganic fertilizer, in 10 of 12 comparisons (1,027–1,280 vs 760–1,037 mg/kg). pH: Higher pH levels were found in soils with organic fertilizer, compared to inorganic fertilizer, in six of 12 comparisons (pH 8.3–8.8 vs 7.5–8.0). Methods: Plots (495 m2) had organic fertilizer (manure pellets: 1.5 t/ha) or inorganic fertilizer (300 kg/ha in summer; three unspecified doses in spring) (three plots for each fertilizer). Plots were drip-irrigated (2,000 m³/ha/year). Soil samples were collected in 2006 (five samples/plot, 0–15 cm depth).

     

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust