Study

Modification of Infiltration Rates in an Organic-Amended Irrigated Soil

  • Published source details Martens D.A. & Frankenberger W.T. (1992) Modification of Infiltration Rates in an Organic-Amended Irrigated Soil. Agronomy Journal, 84, 707-717

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Water: Add manure to the soil

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland

Water: Add sewage sludge to the soil

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland

Soil: Add manure to the soil

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland

Soil: Add sewage sludge to the soil

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland
  1. Water: Add manure to the soil

    A replicated, controlled study in 1997–1998 in irrigated fallow land in California, USA, found similar amounts of water in soils with or without added manure. Water availability: Similar moisture content was found in soils with or without added manure (111 vs 101 g/kg). Methods: Plots (2 x 2 m) had added poultry manure (25 Mg/ha) or no added fertilizer (five plots for each). Manure was added in April 1987, February 1988, and October 1988 and was immediately incorporated into the soil (15 cm depth). Plots were irrigated weekly (100 mm/day). Five soil samples (25–100 mm depth) were taken from each plot.

     

  2. Water: Add sewage sludge to the soil

    A replicated, controlled study in 1997–1998 in irrigated fallow land in California, USA, found similar moisture content in plots with or without added sewage sludge. Water availability: Similar moisture content was found in plots with or without added sewage sludge (117 vs 108 g/kg). Methods: Plots (2 x 2 m) had sewage sludge (25 Mg/ha) or no added fertilizer (five plots each). Sewage sludge was added in April 1987, February 1988, and October 1988 and was immediately incorporated into the soil (15 cm depth). Plots were irrigated weekly (100 mm/day). Five soil samples (25–100 mm depth) were taken from each plot.

     

  3. Soil: Add manure to the soil

    A replicated, controlled study in 1997–1998 in irrigated fallow land in California, USA, found more organic matter and higher carbon dioxide emissions in plots with added manure, compared to plots without manure added. Organic matter: More organic matter was found in soils with added manure (16 vs 10 g/kg). Soil erosion and aggregation: Similar aggregate stability was found in soils with or without added manure (366 vs 300 g/kg). Greenhouse gases: Higher carbon dioxide emissions were found in plots with added manure (3 vs 1 carbon dioxide µg/g/day). Methods: Plots (2 x 2 m) had poultry manure (25 Mg/ha) or no added fertilizer (five plots each). Manure was added in April 1987, February 1988, and October 1988 and was immediately incorporated into the soil (15 cm depth). Plots were irrigated weekly (100 mm/day). Five soil samples (25–100 mm depth) were taken from each plot.

     

  4. Soil: Add sewage sludge to the soil

    A replicated, controlled study in 1997–1998 in irrigated fallow land in California, USA, found more organic matter and carbon dioxide in soils with added sewage sludge, compared to soils without it. Organic matter: More organic matter was found in soils with added sewage sludge, compared to soils without it (19 vs 10 g/kg). Soil erosion and aggregation: Similar amounts of water-stable aggregates were found in soils with or without added sewage sludge (367 vs 300 g/kg). Greenhouse gases: Higher carbon dioxide emissions were found in plots with added sewage sludge compared to plots without it (4 vs 1 µg/g/day). Methods: Plots (2 x 2 m) had sewage sludge (25 Mg/ha) or no added fertilizer (five plots each). Sewage sludge was added in April 1987, February 1988, and October 1988, and immediately incorporated into the soil (15 cm depth). Plots were irrigated weekly (100 mm/day). Five soil samples (25–100 mm depth) were taken from each plot.

     

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust