Study

Long-Term Effects of Compost and Cover Crops on Soil Phosphorus in Two California Agroecosystems

  • Published source details Maltais-Landry G., Scow K., Brennan E. & Vitousek P. (2015) Long-Term Effects of Compost and Cover Crops on Soil Phosphorus in Two California Agroecosystems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 79, 688-697

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Soil: Add compost to the soil

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland

Soil: Grow cover crops in arable fields

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland
  1. Soil: Add compost to the soil

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 2003–2011 in farmland the Salinas Valley, California, USA, found no difference in nutrients or soil organisms between soils with or without added compost. Nutrients: No difference in phosphorus was found between soils with or without added compost (497 vs 456 mg total phosphorus/kg soil). Soil organisms: No difference in microbial biomass (measured as phosphorus) was found between soils with or without added compost (2.0 vs 1.7 mg chloroform-extractable phosphorus/kg soil). Methods: Composted yard waste (15 Mg/ha/year) was added to four treatment plots (240 m2), but not four control plots. Lettuce and broccoli were grown in rotation (two crops/year). Soil samples were collected in soil cores (20 cores/plot, 0–30 cm depth) in 2011.

     

  2. Soil: Grow cover crops in arable fields

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 1993–2011 in arable farmland in Davis and the Salinas Valley, California, USA, found more soil organisms, but no difference in nutrients, in soils with winter cover crops, compared to soils without cover crops. Nutrients: No difference was found in phosphorus, or the change in phosphorus over time, in soils with or without cover crops (2011: 519 vs 517 mg total phosphorus/kg soil; 1994–2011: 23 vs 21 mg less total phosphorus/kg soil; experiment in Davis). Soil organisms: More microbial biomass (measured as phosphorus) was found in soils with cover crops, compared to soils without cover crops (1.4 vs 1 mg phosphorus/kg soil; experiment in Davis). Implementation options: No differences in phosphorus or microbial biomass (measured as phosphorus) were found between soils with different species of cover crops (513–535 mg total phosphorus/kg soil; 3.1–3.7 mg microbial phosphorus/kg soil), or in soils with cover crops grown every year, compared to every four years (513 vs 497 total; 3.8 vs 2.0 microbial; experiment in the Salinas Valley). Methods: In one experiment (in Davis), nitrogen-fixing cover crops (peas, vetch, and/or fava beans) were grown in six treatment plots, but not in six control plots. Wheat was grown in rotation with cover crops (once every two years) or in rotation with fallows. In another experiment (in the Salinas Valley), there were four plots (240 m2) for each of four treatments (legume-rye, mustard, or rye cover crops grown every year, or legume-rye cover crops grown every four years). Lettuce and broccoli were grown in rotation (two crops/year). Soil samples were collected in soil cores (20 cores/plot; 0–30 cm depth) in 2011. Soil cores were also collected in 1993 (number of samples not reported).

     

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust