Study

Effects of tillage systems on weed population and economics for winter wheat production under the Mediterranean dryland conditions

  • Published source details Ozpinar S. (2006) Effects of tillage systems on weed population and economics for winter wheat production under the Mediterranean dryland conditions. Soil and Tillage Research, 87, 1-8

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Pest regulation: Use reduced tillage in arable fields

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland

Crop production: Use reduced tillage in arable fields

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland
  1. Pest regulation: Use reduced tillage in arable fields

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 2002–2003 in a rainfed wheat field in northwest Turkey found more weeds, but similar numbers of weed species, in plots with reduced tillage, compared to conventional tillage. Pest numbers: More weeds were found in plots with reduced tillage, compared to conventional tillage, in three of four comparisons (36–64 vs 29–49 plants/m2), but there were similar numbers of weed species (14–15 vs 11–13). Methods: Conventional tillage with a mouldboard plough, reduced tillage with a rototiller, or reduced tillage with a disc was used on three plots each (75 x 15 m plots). Fertilizer and herbicide were used on all plots. Weeds were measured in nine quadrats/plot (1 x 1 m quadrats, three times/growing season, before the herbicide was used).

     

  2. Crop production: Use reduced tillage in arable fields

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 2001–2003 in a rainfed wheat field in northwest Turkey (same study as (4)) found higher crop yields in plots with reduced tillage, compared to conventional tillage, in one of four comparisons. Crop yield: Higher wheat yields were found in plots with reduced tillage, compared to conventional tillage, in one of four comparisons (rototiller in 2002: 4,055 vs 3,540 kg/ha). Methods: Conventional tillage with a mouldboard plough, reduced tillage with a rototiller, or reduced tillage with a disc was used on three plots each (75 x 15 m plots). Fertilizer and herbicide were used on all plots. Winter wheat was planted in December 2001 and October 2002 and harvested in June 2002 and 2003. Crop yields were measured in three sections/plot (3 m2 sections).

     

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust