Study

Burning, grazing and herbicide control of purple moor-grass Molinia caerulea on moorland in the Yorkshire Dales and Peak District, England

  • Published source details Marrs R.H., Phillips J.D.P., Todd P.A., Ghorbani J. & Le Duc M.G. (2004) Control of Molinia caerulea on upland moors. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 398-411

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use prescribed burning to control grass

Action Link
Shrubland and Heathland Conservation

Use herbicide to control grass

Action Link
Shrubland and Heathland Conservation
  1. Use prescribed burning to control grass

    A randomized, replicated, controlled study in 1995–2000 in four moorland sites in the UK (Marrs et al. 2004) found that prescribed burning to reduce the cover of purple moor grass Molinia caerulea initially reduced vegetation height, but this subsequently recovered. Immediately after prescribed burning vegetation height was lower in burned plots than in unburned plots, however after five years there was no longer a difference in height between burned and unburned plots (no data reported). In 1995 two blocks were established on each site and half of each block was burned. Fencing was established to limit grazing in two plots within each burned area but one plot was left unfenced. Within each plot the herbicide glyphosate was applied in two subplots and one subplot was not sprayed. Vegetation height was measured in 20 random locations with a sward stick in each plot.

  2. Use herbicide to control grass

    A randomized, replicated, controlled study in 1995–2000 in four moorland sites in the UK (Marrs et al. 2004) found that applying herbicide reduced the cover of purple moor grass Molinia caerulea as well as cover of the three plant species, increased the cover of four plant species, and had mixed effects on the cover of six other plant species. In five of five years, areas where herbicide was used had a lower cover of purple moor grass (9-32%) than areas where herbicide was not applied (40-45%). The cover of common heather Calluna vulgaris, crowberry Empetrum nigrum, bilberry Vaccinium myrtillus was lower in areas where herbicide was applied than in areas where it was not applied (no data reported). The cover of cross-leaved heath Erica tetralix, Juncus squarrosus, Polytrichum commune, sphagnum spp. was higher in areas where herbicide was applied than in areas where it was not applied (no data reported). Application of herbicide had an inconsistent effect on the cover of sweet vernal grass Anthoxanthum odouratum, wavy-hair grass Deschampsia flexuosa, common cottongrass Eriophorum angustifolium, Eriophorum vaginatum, deergrass Trichophorum cespitosum and bog cranberry Vaccinium oxycoccus (no data reported). In 1995 two blocks were established on each site and half of each block was burned. Fencing was established to limit grazing in two plots within each burned area but one plot was left unfenced. Within each plot glyphosate herbicide was applied in two subplots and one subplot was not sprayed. Cover of each species was estimated in four 1 m2 quadrats which were randomly placed in each plot.

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust