Study

Winter Cover Crops Affect Monoculture Maize Yield and Nitrogen Leaching under Irrigated Mediterranean Conditions

  • Published source details Salmerón M., Cavero J., Quílez D. & Isla R. (2010) Winter Cover Crops Affect Monoculture Maize Yield and Nitrogen Leaching under Irrigated Mediterranean Conditions. Agronomy Journal, 102, 1700-1709

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Water: Grow cover crops in arable fields

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland

Crop production: Grow cover crops in arable fields

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland

Soil: Grow cover crops in arable fields

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland
  1. Water: Grow cover crops in arable fields

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 2006–2008 in an irrigated maize field in the Ebro river valley, Spain, found that less nitrate was leached from soils with winter cover crops, compared to bare soils, but more water was lost through drainage. Water use: Similar amounts of water were used in plots with cover crops or bare soils (130–200 mm estimated evapotranspiration in the cover-cropping season). Water availability: More water was lost through drainage from plots with cover crops, compared to bare soils, in three of 10 comparisons (during the cover-cropping season: 4–7 vs 0–3 mm). Nutrients: Less nitrate was leached from soils with cover crops, compared to bare soils, in four of nine comparisons (during the maize-growing season: 2 vs 7–10 mg NO3-N/litre; 4–5 vs 23–27 kg NO3-N/ha). Implementation options: Less nitrate was leached from soils that were cover cropped with barley or winter rape, compared to common vetch, in two of three comparisons (during the maize-growing season: 2 vs 10 mg NO3-N/litre). Less water was lost through drainage from plots that were cover cropped with barley or winter rape, compared to common vetch, in two of four comparisons (during the cover-cropping season: 0–1 vs 7 mm). Methods: There were three plots (5.2 m2) for each of three winter cover crops (Hordeum vulgare barley, Brassica rapa winter rape, or Vicia sativa common vetch, sown in October 2006–2007), and there were three control plots with bare soil in winter. Similar amounts of nitrogen were added to all plots (300 kg N/ha), but less of it came from mineral fertilizer in plots with cover crops, to compensate for the organic nitrogen that was added to these plots when the cover crop residues were tilled into the soil. All plots were tilled in spring (March 2007–2008) and autumn (October 2006–2007). All plots were irrigated twice/week (drip irrigation, based on evapotranspiration). Maize was planted in April and harvested in October 2007–2008. Soil samples were collected before the cover crops were incorporated and after the maize was harvested (two soil cores/plot, 5 cm diameter, 0–120 cm depth). Drainage volume and nitrate leaching was measured every week (lysimeters, 5.2 m2 surface area, 1.5 m depth, 50 litre tank).

     

  2. Crop production: Grow cover crops in arable fields

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 2006–2008 in an irrigated maize field in the Ebro river valley, Spain, found lower maize yields in plots with winter cover crops, compared to bare soils. Crop yield: Lower maize yields were found in plots with cover crops, compared to bare soils, in four of five comparisons (barley or winter rape as the cover crops: 14 vs 16–17 Mg/ha). Crop quality: Similar grain quality was found in plots with cover crops or bare soils (530–640 grains/ear; 0.25–0.29 g/kernel). Implementation options: Lower maize yields were found in plots that were cover cropped with non-legumes (barley or winter rape), compared to legumes (common vetch) (14 vs 18 Mg/ha). Methods: There were three plots (5.2 m2) for each of three winter cover crops (Hordeum vulgare barley, Brassica rapa winter rape, or Vicia sativa common vetch, sown in October 2006–2007), and three control plots (bare soil in winter). Similar amounts of nitrogen were added to all plots (300 kg N/ha), but less of it came from mineral fertilizer in plots with cover crops, to compensate for the organic nitrogen that was added to these plots when the cover crop residues were tilled into the soil. All plots were tilled in spring (March 2007–2008) and autumn (October 2006–2007). All plots were irrigated twice/week (drip irrigation, based on evapotranspiration). Maize was planted in April and harvested in October 2007–2008.

     

  3. Soil: Grow cover crops in arable fields

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 2006–2008 in an irrigated maize field in the Ebro river valley, Spain, found less nitrogen in soils with winter cover crops, compared to bare soils, in spring, but found more nitrogen in autumn. Nutrients: In spring (after the cover crops), less nitrogen was found in soils with cover crops, compared to bare soils, in 19 of 20 comparisons (1–11 vs 3–43 mg inorganic N/kg soil, 0–120 cm depth). However, in autumn (after the maize was harvested), more nitrogen was found in plots with cover crops, compared to bare soils, in two of 20 comparisons (barley as the cover crop, 0–30 cm depth: 14–15 vs 4–7 mg inorganic N/kg soil). Methods: There were three plots (5.2 m2) for each of three winter cover crops (Hordeum vulgare barley, Brassica rapa winter rape, or Vicia sativa common vetch, sown in October 2006–2007), and three control plots with bare soil in winter. Similar amounts of nitrogen were added to all plots (300 kg N/ha), but less of it came from mineral fertilizer in plots with cover crops, to compensate for the organic nitrogen that was added to these plots when the cover crop residues were tilled into the soil. All plots were tilled in spring (March 2007–2008) and autumn (October 2006–2007). All plots were irrigated twice/week (drip irrigation, based on evapotranspiration). Maize was planted in April and harvested in October 2007–2008. Soil samples were collected before the cover crops were incorporated and after the maize was harvested (two soil cores/plot, 5 cm diameter, 0–120 cm depth). It was not clear whether these results were a direct effect of cover cropping or adding fertilizer.

     

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust