Study

Soil-plant nitrogen dynamics following incorporation of a mature rye cover crop in a lettuce production system

  • Published source details Wyland L.J., Jackson L.E. & Schulbach K.F. (1995) Soil-plant nitrogen dynamics following incorporation of a mature rye cover crop in a lettuce production system. Journal of Agricultural Science, 124, 17-25

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Grow cover crops when the field is empty

Action Link
Soil Fertility

Amend the soil with fresh plant material or crop remains

Action Link
Soil Fertility

Soil: Grow cover crops in arable fields

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland

Water: Grow cover crops in arable fields

Action Link
Mediterranean Farmland
  1. Grow cover crops when the field is empty

    A controlled, randomized, replicated experiment in 1991-1992 on fine loam in California, USA (Wyland et al. 1995) found reduced soil nitrate under cover-cropped (4.3 g nitrate/m2) compared to bare soil (8.6 g nitrate/m2), prior to rye Secale cereale incorporation. Available nitrogen was also higher under cover-cropped (1.8 g N/m2) compared to bare soil (1.1 g N/m2). There were two winter treatments: a rye Secale cereale crop sown in December then incorporated into the soil after16 weeks using a disc plough, and bare-fallow. Both treatments received the same tillage treatment (regular passes with a disc plough). Plots were 8 x 4 m. There were three replicates. Soil was sampled prior to rye incorporation (60 cm depth).

     

     

  2. Amend the soil with fresh plant material or crop remains

    A controlled, randomized, replicated experiment in 1991-1992 on fine loam in California, USA (Wyland et al. 1995) found higher microbial biomass and available nitrogen in soil with rye Secale cereal incorporated (23 and 35 μg N/g dry soil), compared to bare soil (10 and 20 μg N/g respectively), after three passes with a disc plough. There were two winter treatments: a rye Secale cereale crop sown in December then incorporated into the soil after16 weeks using a disc plough, and bare-fallow. Both treatments received the same tillage treatment (regular passes with a disc plough). Plots were 8 x 4 m. There were three replicates. Soil was sampled prior to rye incorporation (60 cm depth).

     

  3. Soil: Grow cover crops in arable fields

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 1991–1992 in an irrigated lettuce field in the Salinas Valley, California, USA, found less nitrate, but more ammonium, mineralizable nitrogen, and microbial biomass, in soils with winter cover crops, compared to bare soils. Nutrients: Less nitrate, more ammonium, and more mineralizable nitrogen were found in soils with winter cover crops, compared to bare soils, before the cover crops were incorporated into the soil (4.3 vs 8.6 g NO3-N/m2, 0–60 cm depth; 1.8 vs 1.1 g NH4-N/m2, net mineralizable nitrogen, 0–30 cm depth; 0.26 vs 0.24 g NH4-N/m2, 0–60 cm depth), and also in some comparisons after the cover crops were incorporated (1–6 vs 3–24 µg NO3-N/g dry soil, 0–15 cm depth; 3–38 vs 1–21 µg NH4-N/g dry soil, net mineralizable nitrogen, 0–15 cm depth; 0.17–0.98 vs 0.10–0.68 µg NH4-N/g dry soil; 1–15 cm depth; number of significantly different comparisons not clearly reported). Soil organisms: More microbial biomass (measured as nitrogen) was found in soils with winter cover crops, compared to bare soils, in some comparisons (14–29 vs 6–14 µg N/g dry soil). Methods: Three plots had winter cover crops (Merced rye Secale cereale, sown on 19 December 1991) and three plots had bare soils over winter. The plots (raised beds) were 8 x 4 m each. All plots were disked on 8 April (incorporating the cover crops). Soil samples were collected 6 days before the cover crops were incorporated, and on 7–9 days between cover-crop incorporation and lettuce harvesting. Lettuce was sown on 8 May and harvested on 8 July 1992.

     

  4. Water: Grow cover crops in arable fields

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 1991–1992 in an irrigated lettuce field in the Salinas Valley, California, USA, found less water in soils with winter cover crops, compared to bare soils. Water availability: Less water was found in soils with cover crops, compared to bare soils, in some comparisons (7 and 12 days after cover crops were incorporated into the soil: 7–9% vs 9–11% water; total number of significantly different comparisons not clearly reported). Methods: Three plots had winter cover crops (Merced rye Secale cereale, sown on 19 December 1991) and three plots had bare soils over winter. The plots (raised beds) were 8 x 4 m each. All plots were disked on 8 April (incorporating the cover crops). Soil samples were collected on 7–9 days between cover-crop incorporation and lettuce harvesting. Lettuce was sown on 8 May and harvested on 8 July 1992.

     

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust