Study

Responses of ground-dwelling spiders to four hedgerow species on sloped agricultural fields in Southwest China

  • Published source details Wu Y.H., Cai Q.N., Lin C.W., Chen Y.B., Li Y.Y. & Cheng X. (2009) Responses of ground-dwelling spiders to four hedgerow species on sloped agricultural fields in Southwest China. Progress in Natural Science, 19, 337-346

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Plant new hedges

Action Link
Natural Pest Control
  1. Plant new hedges

    A randomised, replicated, controlled study in 2005-2007 in Sichuan, China (Wu et al. 2009) found similar activity densities of ground-dwelling spiders (Araneae) in plots with hedges (averaging 123-212 captures/3 pitfall traps) and control plots without hedges (118-208 captures). Vetiver Vetiveria zizanioides hedges had higher spider densities than false indigo-bush Amorpha fruticosa hedges (57 vs. 44 captures/3 traps) and alfalfa hedges had higher densities than sabaigrass hedges (140 vs. 108 captures) in wheat fields in 2006-2007. Differences in spider densities between hedges and adjacent crops (within plots) varied between years, crops and hedge types. All hedges had higher spider densities than wheat Triticum sp. (averaging 26-52 vs. 16-20 captures/3 traps) in 2005-2006 but in 2006-2007 only sabaigrass Eulaliopsis binate and alfalfa Medicago sativa hedges had higher densities (34-46 captures) than adjacent wheat (16-17 captures). Sabaigrass and alfalfa hedges had higher spider densities (35-46 captures) than maize Zea mays (21-23 captures) in 2006 but hedges had similar densities to maize in 2007. Vetiver hedges, false indigo-bush hedges and bare control strips were tested in one field and sabaigrass hedges, alfalfa hedges and control strips were tested in another. Fields were divided into 7 x 6.5 m plots with each treatment replicated three times.

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust