Study

Reptile and amphibian responses to restoration of fire-maintained pine woodlands

  • Published source details Perry R.W., Rudolph D.C. & Thill R.E. (2009) Reptile and amphibian responses to restoration of fire-maintained pine woodlands. Restoration Ecology, 17, 917-927.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use prescribed burning in combination with vegetation cutting

Action Link
Reptile Conservation

Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in forests

Action Link
Amphibian Conservation
  1. Use prescribed burning in combination with vegetation cutting

    A replicated, site comparison study in 1999–2001 of pine woodland in western Arkansas, USA (Perry et al. 2009) found that restoring woodland by controlled burning and thinning trees resulted in higher abundance of reptiles compared to unrestored woodland. Overall reptile captures were higher in plots with burning and thinning (78 lizards/plot) than in unmanaged plots (54 lizards/plot); as were overall lizard captures (42 vs 28); whereas no difference was found for snakes (34 vs 25) or three-toed box turtles Terrapene carolina triunguis (1 vs 1; the only turtle species caught). Nine plots (11–42 ha) that had been thinned (1980–1990) and then burned at least three times at 3–5-year intervals were sampled. These were compared to three unmanaged, unburned plots. Controlled burns were in March–April. Three drift-fence arrays with pitfall and box traps were established/plot. Traps were checked weekly in April-September 1999–2001.

    (Summarised by: William Morgan)

  2. Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in forests

    A replicated, site comparison study in 1999–2001 of pine woodland in western Arkansas, USA (Perry, Rudolph & Thill 2009) found that controlled burning did not affect amphibian species abundance. There was no significant difference between numbers of captures in burned and unburned plots for all amphibians (73 vs 59), all frogs and toads (71 vs 55), individual species or salamanders (2 vs 4). The most abundantly caught species, the western slimy salamander Plethodon albagula, was captured almost exclusively in unmanaged woodland (28 of 29 captures). Nine plots (11–42 ha) that had been thinned (1980–1990) and then burned at least three times at 3–5-year intervals were sampled. These were compared to three unmanaged, unburned plots. Controlled fires were in March–April. Three drift-fence arrays with pitfall and box traps were established/plot. Traps were checked weekly in April-September 1999–2001.

     

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust