Crop rotation reduces the cost of Colorado potato beetle control in potatoes
-
Published source details
Speese J. & Sterett S.B. (1998) Crop rotation reduces the cost of Colorado potato beetle control in potatoes. HortTechnology, 8, 229-234.
Published source details Speese J. & Sterett S.B. (1998) Crop rotation reduces the cost of Colorado potato beetle control in potatoes. HortTechnology, 8, 229-234.
Actions
This study is summarised as evidence for the following.
Action | Category | |
---|---|---|
Use crop rotation in potato farming systems Action Link |
-
Use crop rotation in potato farming systems
A replicated, controlled study in 1994-1996 in Virginia, USA (Speese & Sterrett 1998) found that potatoes Solanum tuberosum grown in 1995 in plots rotated with wheat Triticum sp. or double-cropped wheat and soybean Glycine max in 1994 had lower Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (pest) populations and 47% higher yields in 1995 (22.52 vs. 15.34 t/ha) than plots where potatoes were grown in 1994. In 1996, Colorado potato beetle populations were much smaller and not significantly different between plots rotated with cotton Gossypium sp. or left fallow and non-rotated plots. In both years, more insecticide sprays were required in non-rotated plots, and in 1995 rotated plots had a return of US$2,342.50/ha compared to US$552.50/ha for non-rotated plots. The experiment used 7.6 m long, three row wide plots in 1994-1995 and 6.1 m long, four row wide plots in 1995-1996. In 1994 rotation crops were wheat or wheat-soybean double crop, and in 1995 rotation crops were cotton or fallow. Unrotated control plots were replicated four times, whilst each rotated plot was replicated twice. Rotated and non-rotated plots were a minimum of 150 m apart. Insecticides were applied based on threshold beetle numbers.
Output references
|