Study

An example of a two-tiered agri-environment scheme designed to deliver effectively the ecological requirements of both localised and widespread bird species in England

  • Published source details Evans A.D. & Green R.E. (2007) An example of a two-tiered agri-environment scheme designed to deliver effectively the ecological requirements of both localised and widespread bird species in England. Journal of Ornithology, 148, 279-286.

Summary

Skylarks Alauda arvensis and stone curlews (Eurasian thick-knees) Burhinus oedicnemus have declined across the UK over recent decades due to changes in agricultural practices. Particularly damaging is the autumn sowing of cereals, which means that crops have grown too tall for ground-nesting birds by the time skylarks and stone curlews begin to nest in spring.

This study investigates the uptake and success of skylark plots and uncropped, cultivated plots (stone curlew plots) in the UK.

 

 

Stone curlew plots

Between 2000 and 2005, 156 stone curlew plots were created in southern England. Plots were 1-2 ha in size and in arable or set aside fields. They were located away from the edges of fields and close (<1 km) from pastures, pig farms or other food sources.

The population of stone curlews in the area and across the UK was monitored from 2000 to 2005.

Skylark plots

Skylark plots consist of undrilled patches in arable fields, where farms briefly stop sowing crops to create uncultivated patches. The uptake of the plots across the UK was monitored in 2005-6.

 

Stone curlew plots

The stone curlew population in southern England increased from 71 breeding pairs in 2000 to 103 in 2005. A further 51 plots were created in 2006 and the UK population increased from 160 pairs in the 1980s to 300 pairs in 2005.

Skylark plots

Skylark plots have been shown to be successful in increasing skylark breeding success, but this study found that only 2.1% of 20,533 agri-environment scheme agreements included skylark plots – enough to provide habitat for 0.6% of the UK skylark population.

The authors suggest that tariffs and compensation schemes need to be reviewed to promote in-field interventions, as well as field-margin interventions.

Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper.

 

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust