Study

Vegetation diversity of conventional and organic hedgerows in Denmark

  • Published source details Aude E., Tybirk K. & Pedersen M.B. (2003) Vegetation diversity of conventional and organic hedgerows in Denmark. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 99, 135-147.

Summary

Organic farming, which primarily aims to avoid the use of pesticides and artificial fertilisers, is one method by which it may be possible to reduce the effects of intensive farming on the environment.  This study investigated plant diversity of comparable hedgerows within organic and conventional farming systems in Denmark.

Thirteen organic hedges on five organic farms and 13 conventional hedges on eight conventional farms (in the same district) were sampled in the southwestern part of Jutland or Weichelian outwash plains in Denmark. All hedgerows had been established 10-14 years ago by the same company; organic hedges were cultivated without pesticides. Fields adjacent to hedges (ley, barley, rape and vegetables) had been managed organically or conventionally since hedgerow establishment; no headlands or unsprayed field margins were present. Farming types only differed in the use of pesticides.

Three pairs of plots (0.5x20 m), one in the centre of the hedgerow and one 0.2m from the field edge, with pairs 20m apart, were sampled per hedge in August 2001. All plant species and species abundance were recorded. A total list of species from 120m on one side of the hedgerows was also obtained by noting supplementary species between plots.

A total of 144 plant species were found, 101 of which occurred in conventional and 128 in organic hedgerows. One protected species was found in an organic hedgerow (broad-leaved helleborine Epipactis helleborine).

There was a significantly greater number of hedge bottom species in organic hedgerows (24-53) than in conventional hedgerows (20-36). Average species richness was significantly higher in organic (15) compared to conventional (13) hedgerows. However, examined separately, boundary samples were more species rich in organic (17) compared to conventional hedges (13), but samples within the hedgerow were not (organic: 14; conventional: 12). Organic hedgerows were significantly richer in weedy, ruderal and semi-natural species; there was no difference in abundance of bryophytes or forest species.

Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00146-4

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust