Study

The effect of leaf-litter clearance in Mediterranean temporary pools on quillwort Isoetes setacea in Roque-Haute Natural Reserve, Languedoc-Roussillon, France

  • Published source details Rhazi M., Grillas P., Charpentier A. & Médial F. (2004) Experimental management of Mediterranean temporary pools for conservation of the rare quillwort Isoetes setacea. Biological Conservation, 118, 675-684

Summary

Mediterranean temporary pools are species-rich, containing many rare and endangered species. Land use changes, however, have resulted in invasion of pools by shrubs and trees. In this study, leaf litter was removed or added from plots in a temporary pool to determine the effect on a rare Mediterranean quillwort, Isoetes setacea. This management was combined with the experimental clearance of scrub from the pool (see Case 350).

Study site & experimental design: One pool harboring quillwort Isoetes setacea was selected at Roque-Haute Natural Reserve (situated in the province of Languedoc-Roussillon) for leaf-litter removal or addition. The pool (surface area = 352 m²) was invaded mainly by elm Ulmus trees, and was shaded by shrubs from the surrounding dry shrubland. I.setacea was present but scattered in the pool. The pool was divided into two halves: a control zone (176 m²) and a zone to be cleared of scrub and trees (160 m). In May 2000, the frequency of I.setacea and the thickness of the litter was measured in 16 continuous quadrats (0.3 x 0.3 m) placed within each of 20 plots (1.2 x 1.2 m); the plots were equally divided between the control zone and the zone to be cleared. Each quadrat was divided into nine squares (0.1 x 0.1 m) and the presence/absence of I.setacea was recorded in each, giving a frequency from 0 to 9. Litter depth was measured with a ruler pushed vertically down through the litter until the underlying sediment was reached.

In November 2000, the scrub was cleared using a chainsaw and a brush cutter. Also, within each of the two zones, five randomly chosen plots had their leaf litter removed and the litter was added to the remaining five plots, doubling litter thickness. In May 2001, the frequency of I.setacea and the thickness of the litter was re-measured for each of the continuous quadrats.

Litter thickness was an average of 18.8 mm (± 8.1 Standard Deviation) in the cleared and 40.5 mm (± 15.9) in the control zone in May 2000. After litter addition, thickness was 63.1 mm (± 1.9). The frequency of I.setacea was significantly higher after litter removal in the cleared zone, with numbers (estimated from original figure)as follows:

In plots with litter removed, quillwort frequency increased by an average of 15. In plots with litter added, the frequency fell by four but this was not a significant decrease.

A similar pattern was seen in the control plots with numbers (estimated from original figure) as follows:

Litter removal resulted in an increase in frequency of three and litter addition a decrease in frequency of 1.5, these changes in frequencies, were however, not significant.

Conclusions: At Roque-Haute Natural Reserve, removal of accumulated vegetation litter combined with scrub clearance had a strong positive effect on the growth of I.setacea.


Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper. This is available from http://www.environmental-expert.com/magazine/elsevier/biocon/index.htm. Please do not quote as a conservationevidence.com case as this is for previously unpublished work only.

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust