Study

Effectiveness of head-starting to bolster Philippine crocodile Crocodylus mindorensis populations in San Mariano municipality, Luzon, Philippines

  • Published source details van de Ven W.A.C. , Guerrero J.P., Rodriguez D.G., Telan S.P., Balbas M.G., Tarun B.A., van Weerd M., van der Ploeg J., Wijtten Z., Lindeyer F.E. & de Iongh H.H. (2009) Effectiveness of head-starting to bolster Philippine crocodile Crocodylus mindorensis populations in San Mariano municipality, Luzon, Philippines. Conservation Evidence, 6, 111-116.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Head-start wild-caught reptiles for release: Crocodilians

Action Link
Reptile Conservation
  1. Head-start wild-caught reptiles for release: Crocodilians

    A replicated, controlled study in 2005–2009 in a captive facility and ponds, creeks and rivers in northern Luzon, Philippines (van de Ven et al. 2009; same experimental set-up as van Weerd et al. 2010) found that most head-started Philippine crocodiles Crocodylus mindorensis survived rearing in captivity and at least half survived their first year in the wild. After one year in captivity, head-started Philippine crocodile hatchling survival was 72% (63 of 88), compared to 47% (17 of 36) for wild hatchlings (results were not statistically tested). After one year in the wild, at least 17 of 32 (53%) head-started hatchling crocodiles were still alive. Authors reported that the released head-started crocodiles adapted well to natural conditions and increased in size. In 2005–2008, crocodile hatchlings were collected from the wild just after hatching (88 individuals) and 32 crocodiles were released back into their natural habitat after being head-started for 14–18 months (31 still held in captivity in 2009). Two ponds (75–450 m2) were created to provide suitable release habitat. Growth and survival was monitored by night surveys for one year after release. In 2000–2006, thirty-six wild hatchlings were monitored every three months for one year to compare survival rates.

    (Summarised by: Maggie Watson, Katie Sainsbury)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust