Influence of aboveground biomass removal on nitrogen mineralization in a restored tallgrass prairie

  • Published source details Tix D., Hebberger J.A. & Charvat I. (2006) Influence of aboveground biomass removal on nitrogen mineralization in a restored tallgrass prairie. Restoration Ecology, 14, 561-568.


Native prairies tend to have soils of low nitrogen (N) availability, an important factor that maintains plant diversity. Periodic burning is a common prairie management practice which influences soil N. This experiment compared soil N properties after a prescribed fire with that following vegetation removal by mowing and raking at Murphy Lake, a 38 ha restored mesic tallgrass prairie in Minnesota (44°42′N, 93°20′W; north USA).

Restoration began in 1995 on an agricultural field. At the commencement of the experiment it was dominated by two native prairie grasses, big bluestem Andropogon gerardii and Indian grass Sorghastrum nutans. The most recent burn was in spring 1997.
In summer 2000, 28 (10 x 10 m) plots were established. Three treatments were applied in spring (4-9 May) 2001 and (23-30 April) 2002, plus an untreated control, assigned randomly to each plot within a block (7 replicates/treatment). In each block, one plot was burned, and two were mowed and raked (one with lime added in year one to mimic deposition of basic cations via ash during a fire, which increases soil pH).

Aboveground plant biomass removal by the two treatments had similar effects on soil moisture, temperature and inorganic N, and created warmer and drier soil than in the control plots.
Net N mineralization after raking was unaffected by lime addition. In the first year (low rainfall), the two treatments had N mineralization rates similar to controls. During the second year (heavy rainfall), mineralization rates were significantly higher (and similar) in removal plots. After fire, soil pH temporarily increased slightly (attributed to ash deposition). Plant productivity (biomass) was also significantly greater on burned than control plots during 2002.
Aboveground biomass removal was the primary factor leading to changes in net N mineralization following burning. The authors suggest that for prairie restorations on nutrient-enriched soils (e.g. previously fertilized agricultural land), frequent burning will likely decrease soil N and thus benefit plant diversity.
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust