Study

Efficacy of four herbicides for restoring native grasses in buffelgrass Pennisetum ciliare-invaded grasslands at the Texas A&M University-Kingsville Bomer Wildlife Management Area, Texas, USA

  • Published source details Tjelmeland A.D., Fulbright T.E. & Lloyd-Reilley J. (2008) Evaluation of herbicides for restoring native grasses in buffelgrass-dominated grasslands. Restoration Ecology, 16, 263-269

Summary

In Texas (southern USA) buffelgrass Pennisetum ciliare is a non-native invasive that threatens arid and semi-arid ecosystems. A study was undertaken in buffelgrass-dominated grasslands at Texas A&M University-Kingsville Bomer Wildlife Management Area, to assess effectiveness of five herbicides at reducing buffelgrass competition to enhance establishment of three species of native grasses.

Buffelgrass-dominated pasture was mown (cut-material raked-off) on 2 September 2002. On 18 September and 7 October 2002, glyphosate herbicide was applied as a pre-treatment. On 8 October, a seed mix of three native grasses (green sprangletop Leptochloa dubia, plains bristlegrass Setaria leucopila, and four-flower trichloris Chloris pluriflora) was drill-seeded.
 
Two experiments were undertaken, treatments (plus controls) applied to plots (10 x 10 m) in randomized complete block design:
 
1) three treatments (four replicates) of two rates (1.12 and 2.24 kg/ha) of 80% tebuthiuron, applied pre-emergence (9 October 2002);
 
2) six treatments (four replicate) of three post-emergent herbicides (Weedmaster, Plateau and Grazon) applied 27 July 2003).
 
Percent canopy cover was estimated within each plot during April, June and October 2003 and August 2004.

Tebuthiuron at 2.24 kg/ha suppressed buffelgrass cover compared with controls and increased native grasses (particularly Chloris) for almost 2 years after application, thus providing a potential restoration treatment.

Post-emergent herbicides had no significant effect on buffelgrass or planted grass cover. Native grass cover never exceeded 8% in any treatment. Buffelgrass cover returned to pre-treatment levels in less than 1 year.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00269.x/full

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust