Planting California pipevine Aristolochia californica in gardens does not benefit the pipevine swallowtail Battus philenor for 40 years; trials in San Francisco, California, USA
-
Published source details
Levy J.M. & Connor E.F. (2004) Are gardens effective in butterfly conservation? A case study with the pipevine swallowtail, Battus philenor. Journal of Insect Conservation, 8, 323-330
Published source details Levy J.M. & Connor E.F. (2004) Are gardens effective in butterfly conservation? A case study with the pipevine swallowtail, Battus philenor. Journal of Insect Conservation, 8, 323-330
Summary
‘Butterfly gardening’ involves planting caterpillar food plants and nectar plants in gardens. Some environmental organisations have suggested that gardens could replace lost natural habitat for butterflies. In California, the pipevine swallowtail Battus philenor lays eggs exclusively on the California pipevine Aristolochia californica. This study compared the butterfly’s use of the plant in gardens where it was planted to encourage butterflies, with that in natural populations, in and around San Francisco, California, USA.
California pipevine plants were monitored in nine gardens and at nine natural sites in 2001, and 23 gardens and 11 natural sites in 2002. The plants were observed for 15 minutes to record visiting adult butterflies, and the foliage was inspected for eggs or caterpillars, every week from March to mid-July each year. The height and area covered by each vine was recorded, and the year of planting. Natural vines, for which there was no record of age, were classed as being 80 years old, equivalent to the oldest garden planting.
Adult pipevine swallowtails visited and laid eggs in significantly fewer garden sites than natural sites (visits to eight of nine natural sites and one of nine gardens in 2001; all natural sites and only eight of 23 gardens, in 2002). All visited natural sites had egg-laying, but only 75% of visited gardens had egg-laying.
Output references
|