Study

Trends in the recovery of a rosy marsh moth Coenophila subrosea (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) population in response to fire and conservation management on a lowland raised mire

  • Published source details Fowles A.P., Bailey M.P. & Hale A.D. (2004) Trends in the recovery of a rosy marsh moth Coenophila subrosea (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) population in response to fire and conservation management on a lowland raised mire. Journal of Insect Conservation, 8, 149-158.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Restore or create peatland

Action Link
Butterfly and Moth Conservation

Use prescribed fire to maintain or restore disturbance in grasslands or other open habitats

Action Link
Butterfly and Moth Conservation
  1. Restore or create peatland

    A before-and-after study in 1988–2003 in a raised bog in Ceredigion, UK (Fowles et al. 2004) reported that a re-wetted bog supported a larger population of rosy marsh moth Coenophila subrosea caterpillars than before drains were blocked. Results were not tested for statistical significance. One to five years after the last drains were blocked, 27–88 caterpillars/year were recorded, compared to 8–27 caterpillars/year in the preceding 10 years. From the mid-1980s, large drains surrounding a raised bog were dammed. In 1993 and 1998, shallow peat-cuttings were also blocked, raising the water table at the site from 42 cm to 48 cm over 15 years. In late May 1988–2003, caterpillars were counted once/year, at night, in fourteen 15 × 1 m plots along a transect across the bog.

    (Summarised by: Andrew Bladon)

  2. Use prescribed fire to maintain or restore disturbance in grasslands or other open habitats

    A site comparison study in 1988–2003 in a raised bog in Ceredigion, UK (Fowles et al. 2004) reported that a burned bog had fewer rosy marsh moth Coenophila subrosea caterpillars than an unburned bog. Results were not tested for statistical significance. For 2–5 years after burning, caterpillars were scarce in the burned area (0–3 individuals/year) compared to the unburned area (6–24 individuals/year). From 6–9 years after burning, numbers were similar in burned (5–13 individuals/year) and unburned (6–15 individuals/year) areas. From 10–14 years after burning, the burned area had 6–24 individuals/year compared to 2–17 individuals/year on the unburned area. From 16–17 years after burning, the burned area had 16–38 individuals/year compared to 33–50 individuals/year on the unburned area. From 1968, fire frequency was reduced on a raised bog, and the last burn occurred in 1974. In February 1986, two-thirds of the bog was accidentally burned. In late May 1988–2003, caterpillars were counted once/year, at night, in seven 15 × 1 m plots in the burned area and seven in the unburned area.

    (Summarised by: Andrew Bladon)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust