Study

Control of purple moor-grass Molinia caerulea by cutting management on Nardus stricta sub-alpine grassland in the Giant Mountains, Czech Republic

  • Published source details Hejcmana M. & Pavlu V. (2010) Control of Molinia caerulea by cutting management on sub-alpine grassland. Molinia caerulea by cutting management on sub-alpine grassland. Flora, 577-582

Summary

 

Following abandonment of traditional mowing of mat-grass Nardus stricta sub-alpine grasslands in the Giant Mountains (Krkonoše), northern Czech Republic, over the last 50 years purple moor-grass Molinia caerulea has expanded considerably. This study investigated whether reinstatement of the traditional mowing regime would reverse Molinia encroachment and help to restore the original Nardus grassland.

 

 

The traditional mowing regime of one cut per year in late July was introduced to study plots over a period of six years, and plant response compared with adjacent unmown areas (control). Vegetation parameters (including percent cover, canopy height, panicle density and biomass production) were recorded. Species richness was determined and soil nutrient availability analysed.

 

 

After 6 years of mowing management, Molinia cover decreased significantly (from 79% to 7%), canopy height declined from an average of 45 to 14 cm, biomass production declined from 313 to 54 g/m² and panicle density from 129 to 18/m². As mowing progressed and Molinia declined, patches of bare ground were created and partly colonized by wavy hair-grass Deschampsia (Avenella) flexuosa. No Nardus seedlings appeared in the mown plots, despite it being common in adjacent areas.
Cutting significantly decreased potassium (K) availability in the soil (8 g/m² removed over 6 years). Compared to the control, N:P, N:K and K:P ratios in the plant biomass were not significantly affected by mowing.
No significant effect of cutting on species richness was apparent, thus although reinstatement of cutting reduced Molinia, it did not increase species richness and restoration to original Nardus grassland was not achieved over the 6-year study period.
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03672530

 

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust