Study

Substitutes for grazing in semi-natural grasslands - do mowing or mulching represent valuable alternatives to maintain vegetation structure?

  • Published source details Römermann C., Bernhardt-Römermann M., Kleyer M. & Poschlod P. (2009) Substitutes for grazing in semi-natural grasslands - do mowing or mulching represent valuable alternatives to maintain vegetation structure?. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1086-1098.

Summary

 

Ancient semi-natural grasslands in Europe are very valuable for nature conservation due to the high floristic and faunistic diversity that they support. Such grasslands, traditionally livestock grazed for centuries, have been increasingly abandoned or management has changed as grazing is no longer economically viable. A study was undertaken on species-rich calcareous grassland in St. Johann in the Swabian Alb Mountains of Baden-Württemberg (southwest Germany) to assess the suitability of different mowing regimes as an alternative to grazing to maintain these grasslands.

 

Until 1974, the grassland was sheep grazed at low intensity, after which 'mulching' (i.e. mowing without removal of cut material) regimes were introduced: mulching once per year (in late summer), twice per year (early and late summer) or every second year (in late summer). One part of the site continued to be grazed, and another site was unmanaged.

Mowing (i.e. cut material removed) was introduced in 1981 at an abandoned site.
In 1974, a permanent (5 x 5 m) quadrat was established at each site within each treatment area. Percentage vegetation cover was monitored every 3-5 years to 2004. Changes in floristic and functional composition were analysed.

 

In the grazed area vegetation was in functional and floristic equilibrium. All alternative management treatments led to vegetation changes. Mulching twice per year and mowing where best at maintaining floristic composition and structure in a (desired) state most similar to that of the grazed area.
The authors consider that the alternative management treatments tested are not appropriate to sustain the typical disturbance dynamics of these grasslands. They suggest that if grazing cannot be maintained on species-rich semi-natural grasslands, cutting at least twice per year is required.

Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/122602670/PDFSTART

 

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust