Study

Effect of three intensities of clipping on the density and production of meadow vegetation

  • Published source details Pond F.W. (1961) Effect of three intensities of clipping on the density and production of meadow vegetation. Journal of Range Management, 14, 34-38.

Summary

Meadows bordering streams provide important forage for grazing animals in the Bighorn National Forest of Wyoming (northwest USA). A study was undertaken on three meadows, one almost of entirely native vegetation (summarised here) and two mostly of non-native plants, of how best to graze these meadows to maintain their integrity and productivity.

Three intensities of clipping (simulating grazing) were applied to three meadows from 1952 through 1955. Vegetation in one comprised almost entirely native sedges and grasses (primarily ovalhead sedge Carex festivella, beaked sedge C.rostrata, Raynold’s sedge C.raynoldsi, dunhead sedge C.phaeocephala, baltic rush Juncus balticus and tufted hairgrass Deschampsia cespitosa) and forbs. Vegetation in the other two was dominated by non-native Kentucky blue grass Poa pratensis and white clover Trifolium repens (not considered further).

 
Two cages (about 2.5 x 2.5 m) were erected to exclude large grazing mammals. Within each, six (30 x 60 cm) plots were clipped annually from 1952 to 1955, inclusive. Treatments (2 replicates each) were:
 
1) clipped to 2.5 cm height every two weeks;
 
2) clipped to 7.5 cm height every two weeks;
 
3) clipped to 2.5 cm height at the end of the growing season (about 15 September);
 
4) unclipped (control).
 
 
Measurements of vegetation density (species cover) and forage production (dry weight from clippings, all species combined) were measured in 1952 and 1956. Rainfall during three of the four years was below average.

Clipping to 2.5 cm every two weeks reduced total density and production of grasses and sedges (total graminoids 55.5% cover in 1952, 18.0% in 1956) with some species e.g. beaked sedge (7.5% cover in 1952) disappearing from both plots.
 
Clipping to 7.5 cm every two weeks had relatively little effect on plant density (total graminoids 56.5% cover in 1952, 44.5% in 1956) but production deceased, primarily through a reduction in sedges.
 
Non-native Kentucky blue grass absent in both sets of these plots in 1952 had 2.0% cover in clipped to 2.5 cm every two weeks plots and 8.0% cover in 7.5 cm clipped plots, in 1956. It was however present in the control plots in 1952 (4.5% cover) but decreased by 1956 (3.0%).
 
Clipping at the end of the growing season had little effect on native species.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: http://digitalcommons.library.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume14/Number1/

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust