Study

Effect of mowing date on native meadow vegetation on the Adams Ranch in the Osage Hills of Oklahoma, USA

  • Published source details Hazell D.B. (1965) Vegetative composition, forage production, and plant vigor as influenced by date of mowing. Journal of Range Management, 18, 261-264

Summary

In the Osage Hills of northern Oklahoma (south central USA) it is common practice to mow native grass meadows in autumn, but whether this is best management was unclear. This study, undertaken on the Adams Ranch (a 13,355 ha prairie range), compared two meadows mowed at different times of the year (summer or early autumn) to assess how composition, forage production and plant vigour are affected by mowing date.

Dominant grasses were big bluestem Andropogon gerardi, little bluestem A.scoparius, indiangrass Sorghastrum nutans and switchgrass Panicum virgatum. One meadow was traditionally mown annually around 1 July for hay. The other (6 ha) was mown annually in late August-early September.

In 1961 and 1962, the point intercept method was used to determine percent basal cover and species composition by area. Abundance was determined in 100 randomly located 30 x 30 cm quadrats per meadow.
 
Forage production was determined by clipping vegetation within 20 (29 x 61 cm) quadrats, drying and weighing. Vigour of important plant species was assessed by measurements of: maximum height, average height, leaf length, width and number.

In both years, the meadows were considered in excellent range condition, species composition was very similar and there was no correlation between mow date and basal density (both about 10 %).
 
Of 12 grasses recorded, little bluestem was most abundant (58.5-68.5 % composition). Big bluestem contributed higher percent composition in the July-mown meadow (average 43.5% over the study years) compared to the later mown meadow (10.9 %).Conversely indian grass was more common in the late-mown meadow (average 15.0 %) compared to the July mown meadow (5.5 %). Contributions of other grass species were similar between meadows.
 
In both years the July-mown meadow produced more forage (average 3,806 lb/acre dry weight) compared to the later mown meadow (2,141 lb/acre).
 
Mow date appeared to affect plant vigour in that grasses in the July-mown meadow had (statistically) significantly greater maximum height, average height and leaf length compared to the same species in other meadow.
 
Although the same forb species occurred in both meadows, their abundance was markedly different in each. The later mown meadow had a far greater number of forbs (240,887 vs. 89,522/acre), and its dominant species were uncommon in the July-mown meadow.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: http://digitalcommons.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume18/Number5/

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust