Effect of clipping on herbage and flower stalk production of three summer range forbs

  • Published source details Julander O. (1968) Effect of clipping on herbage and flower stalk production of three summer range forbs. Journal of Range Management, 21, 74-79.


In North American subalpine and alpine pastures, forbs may supply much spring-summer forage for deer (e.g. elk Cervus elaphus), sheep and cattle. This study on the Wasatch Plateau (Utah) was designed to provide guidelines for best grazing utilization of three important perennial forage forbs by determining the effect of different degrees of clipping (mimicking natural grazing intensities) on herbage and flower stalk production over 10 years.

The study plants were: Richardson geranium Geranium richardsoni, Porter’s ligusticum Ligusticum porteri and edible valerian Valeriana edulis (between about 2,575-3,000 m altitude).

Twelve plants of each species were chosen in each of two adjacent blocks, protected from grazing and randomly assigned one of four treatments: control (unclipped), or clipped 50, 75 or 90% (by above-ground weight) once each year from 1951-1960.
Plants were clipped at flowering near maximum growth (usually mid-July for geranium and during the first 10 days of August for ligusticum and valerian). Herbage production (dry weight) was estimated and flower stalks counted. Plants were checked in autumn 1965 to determine mortality and to estimate vigour.

Herbage production of plants clipped at 75 and 90% decreased rapidly over the years and production by 1960 (as a percentage of unclipped plants) was:
Ligusticum: 50% clipped - 60%, 75% clipped - 28%, 90% clipped - 14%;
Valerian: 50% clipped - 55%, 75% clipped - 20%, 90% clipped - 13%;
Geranium: 50% clipped - 35%, 75% clipped - 7%, 90% clipped - 1%.
Compared to the controls, flower stalk production also declined (flower stalk production/plant; 10 year average):
Ligusticum: control - 4.1, 50% clipped - 3.1, 75% clipped - 2.0, 90% clipped - 1.4;
Valerian: control - 1.7, 50% clipped - 1.0, 75% clipped - 0.7, 90% clipped - 0.6;
Geranium: control - 6.8, 50% clipped - 4.3, 75% clipped - 2.8, 90% clipped - 2.1.
Under the two higher clipping intensities, few mature seeds were produced after 3-4 years of treatment and in the last three years (1958-60) no geranium flowered.
In 1965, all unclipped plants were alive and ‘vigerous’. All clipped Ligusticum were doing well, except one weak 90% clipped plant. Valerians clipped 50% were recovering well and those clipped 75% generally recovering less well. One clipped 90% was dead, and two were weak. Geraniums clipped 50% were all alive, two clipped 75% were dead, all clipped 90% were dead.
Overall, ligusticum was most tolerant to clipping. Geranium was least tolerant indicating that grazing intensity should accordingly be lower in order to ensure its perpetuation.
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust