Study

Effect of timing of spring burn on plant community composition and herbage yields of bluestem grassland on the Donaldson Pastures in the Flint Hills of Kansas, USA

Summary

Burning (wildfires and man-induced) have shaped North American prairie plant communities. On the Donaldson Pastures in the Flint Hills of eastern Kansas (central USA), the effect of timing of spring burns on vegetation yields and plant community composition on bluestem range under moderate cattle grazing was assessed over 17 years.

Vegetation was dominated by warm-season perennial grasses: big bluestem Andropogon gerardi and little bluestem A.scoparius (contributing 50-60% by basal area), Indiangrass Sorghastrum nutans, switchgrass Panicum virgatum and sideoats grama Bouteloua curtipendula 10-20%, with numerous other grasses and forbs.

Three 17.8 ha pastures were burned annually for 17 years (1950-1966) at three spring dates: early (20 March), mid (10 April) or late (1 May). A similar, unburned 24.3 ha pasture served as a control. All were cattle-grazed season long at moderate intensity (approximately 5 acres/animal unit).
 
Species composition (percentage of total plant basal cover) within each pasture was estimated by measuring the basal intercept of each plant along 20 to 30 randomly placed 5-m long line transects.
Range condition (poor, fair, good or excellent) was estimated annually.
 
Each year within randomly placed (0.86 m²) wire cages (to exclude cattle), vegetation was clipped to ground level and likewise adjacent plots open to grazing. Material was separated into forage, weeds, and mulch, dried and weighed.

Cool season species were reduced by spring burning and desirable warm season perennial grasses benefitted, as is the aim of spring burning. Likewise some weedy species, whose growth similarly initiates in late spring/summer subsequent to burns, also increased. Herbage yields were reduced by early and mid-spring burning, but late spring burn yields were similar to the control.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: https://www.uair.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume23/Number2/

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust