Study

Assessment of best sheep grazing regimes to minimize impact on big game winter forage in sagebrush-grass rangeland, Hardware Ranch, Utah, USA

  • Published source details Jensen C.H., Smith A.D. & Scotter G.W. (1972) Guidelines for grazing sheep on rangelands used by big game in winter. Journal of Range Management, 25, 346-352

Summary

Free-ranging domestic livestock compete with wild grazing mammals for forage. In this study, an attempt was made to ascertain best sheep-grazing practice on sagebrush grass habitat to reduce competition with ‘big game‘, which use the area in winter. Grazing trials were undertaken on the Hardware Ranch near Logan city, Utah (mid-west USA).  Rangeland was sheep-grazed at different times to ascertain what seasons and intensity of use would maximize grazing of herbs whilst minimising browsing of shrubs which provide most big game forage in winter.

From 1967 through 1969, 12 pastures (each approximately 3 acres; 1.2 ha) were arranged in pairs and each pair was grazed over one of six 8-16 day periods. Beginning dates for grazing were around 20 May, 20 June, 15 July, 10 August, 5 September and 1 October each year.  Grazing intensities were alternated each year on the pasture pairs.
 
In 1967, grazing intensities were 40% (moderate) and 70% (heavy) utilization of the two assumed key herb forage species, Pacific aster Aster chilensis and arrowleaf balsamroot Balsamorhiza sagittata. Grazing intensities assigned in 1968 and 1969 were based on pre-grazing estimates of ‘usable’ forage.
 
Bitterbrush Purshia tridentata was the most desirable and abundant shrub for big game. Sheep browsing intensity was recorded by measuring twigs on four branches on each of 50 plants per pasture. In 1968 and 1969 in adjacent areas, 30 bitterbrush plants were selected to determine rate of twig growth when sheep were excluded.

From late spring to early summer sheep ate mostly herbs, and the fairly light browsing of shrubs (e.g. average utilization over the 3 study years for bitterbrush: moderate intensity 22-23 %; heavy 32-45%) observed resulted in little or no reduction in shrub forage production at the end of the growing season (autumn).
 
After mid-July, sheep heavily browsed bitterbrush (average utilization (over 3 years): moderate intensity 33-72%; heavy 60-87%) and it did not recover fully before winter set in, thus over-winter bitterbrush forage available for big game was reduced.
 
Results indicate that sheep grazing prior to mid-July at the intensities trialed did not adversely reduce the quantity of bitterbrush and other shrub over-winter forage available to big game. There was no evidence that subsequent annual productivity of shrubs and plants was impaired by any of the grazing regimes.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:
https://www.uair.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume25/Number5/

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust