Effects of range burning on Kansas Flint Hills soil

  • Published source details Owensby C.E. & Wyrill J.B. (1973) Effects of range burning on Kansas Flint Hills soil. Journal of Range Management, 26, 185-188.


Burning is a widely used in prairie management in the bluestem range of the Flint Hills (eastern Kansas to north-central Oklahoma, USA). In this study (undertaken near Manhattan, Kansas), the long-term effects of prescribed burns at different times of the year on chemical and physical properties of a loamy upland soil, were studied in livestock grazed and non-grazed areas.

Vegetation comprised primarily three native, warm-season perennial grasses, big bluestem Andropogon gerardi, little bluestem A.scoparius and indiangrass Sorghastrum nutans.
In 1926, an ungrazed unit was fenced and burning initiated within 10 (10.1 x 20.2 m) plots with five replicates per treatment (five burned annually and five biennially). Treatments (and approximate burn dates) were: winter (1 December), early spring (March 20), mid-spring (10 April) and late spring (1 May), and unburned (control). The study was suspended in 1944 but resumed in 1950, with all plots burned annually thereafter (to 1971).
The grazed unit was initiated in 1950 and divided into two: one area (44 acres; 17.8 ha) was burned annually from 1950 to 1971 in late spring; the second (60 acres; 24.3 ha) was unburned between 1950 and 1971. Both were stocked with yearling cattle at moderate rate (8 acre/animal unit) from 1 May to 1 October.
In November 1970, representative soil samples were taken with a hydraulic soil probe (3.8 cm diameter) to 1.22 m depth from all areas, and analysed for pH, organic matter, Ca, Mg, N, P and K.

The two tallgrass prairie areas burned annually for 20 (grazed) and 48 (ungrazed) years at different seasons of the year exhibited some differences in soil properties.
Winter, early-spring, and mid-spring burned ungrazed plots were generally higher in soil pH, organic matter and K than late-spring burned or unburned plots.
On ungrazed plots, winter burning caused most changes, with higher soil pH, organic matter, Ca, Mg, K, and lower soil N than with other treatments; late-spring burning had the least influence. Late-spring and winter burning also lowered soil N on grazed plots.
Although some difference in soil nutrient levels were statistically significant, these significant differences were so small that the authors consider it is unlikely that they are large enough to affect plant growth.
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust