Study

Late autumn vs. spring seeding in the establishment of crested wheatgrass Agropyron desertorum on degraded steppe in Zarand Saveh region, northern Iran

  • Published source details Moghaddam M.R. (1976) Late fall vs spring seeding in the establishment of crested wheatgrass in the Zarand Saveh region of Iran. Journal of Range Management, 29, 57-59

Summary

Due to long-term livestock overgrazing, native arid steppe (prevalent species including whitewormwood Artemisia herba-alba, the chenopod Salsola rigida and feather grass Stipa barbata) in the Zarand Saveh region of northern Iran is severely degraded. Attempts were made to improve vegetation condition by sowing with crested wheatgrass Agropyron desertorum (native to the region). Success of early spring and late autumn seeding were compared.

A seriously deteriorated homogenous area was selected. Seedbed preparation comprised ploughing, discing and rolling. Seed was drill-seeded at 2.54 cm depth (row spacing 50 cm) at a rate of 5.75 kg/ha. Autumn sowing was undertaken 17 November 1972, and in early spring on 24 March 1973.

Monitoring was undertaken in 20 randomly located 1 m² plots. Crested wheatgrass seedlings were counted within each after seedling emergence and again in mid-summer (time of maximum growth) for 2 years. Reproductive shoots (seed stalks) for each plant were counted.

Best wheatgrass emergence and establishment was obtained from autumn seeding. There was higher seedling emergence (37.5 seedlings/m² vs. 31.1/m²) and a greater density of (more vigorous) plants in both summers (1973: 27.8 vs. 13.1; 1974: 25.2 vs. 10.9).

The number of reproductive stems was also higher for autumn sowing. In the first year flowering was low (2 plants/m² flowered in autumn sown plots but none in spring sown). In 1974, 25.2 plants/m² flowered in autumn sown plots (average 14.5 shoots/plant) and 10.9/m² in spring sown plots (average 1.8 shoots/plant).
 
The author suggests that autumn seeding yielded better results as seeds were able to germinate earlier in the spring (i.e. longer period of access to soil moisture before depletion and onset of high summer temperatures) than spring seeded plants.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: https://www.uair.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume29/Number1/

 

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust